TeamStorm MCP
Related Servers
Alternatives to TeamStorm MCP
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI coding agents to take and progress tasks, hand in completed work with evidence, and enables users to publish, search, and retrieve guides, file bugs, manage inbox/board/activity/logs, and plan tasks over MCP.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables AI assistants and IDEs to manage workspaces, projects, tasks, and AI agents through natural language, including creation, updates, completion, assignment, and automation. It also supports generating MCP tools from arbitrary OpenAPI specs for broader API integration.3,386 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to research, plan, generate requirements, map codebases, create starter projects, manage tasks, and run multi-step software development workflows through MCP tools.19 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables MCP clients to read the task database and send natural-language messages to the app's agent for changes, without direct write access.MIT

@letretro/mcpofficial
AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI coding tools to access LetRetro retrospectives, boards, cards, and team data through MCP.9 npm1MIT- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceEnables AI agents to manage tasks on a local-first board via MCP, exposing task creation, updates, and queries through a thin adapter over the REST service.7MIT
TDQS
Scored across 15 tools
Most tools target a distinct action on a distinct resource, and the descriptions carefully delineate get_task (by key) from get_task_context (for requirements). The main overlap is update_task versus set_task_description, both of which can change a task's description, though the special templated behavior of the latter differentiates them.
Every tool uses the same teamstorm_ prefix followed by a consistent snake_case verb_noun pattern (create_task, get_comments, schedule_task_closure). The convention is uniform across all 15 tools with no camelCase or stylistic deviations.
15 tools sit at the top of the well-scoped range and each maps to a concrete capability (CRUD on tasks, comments, attachments, links, pages, and closure scheduling). No tool appears redundant with the count.
Core task lifecycle is covered (create/update/read, comments add/get, closure scheduling), but notable gaps exist: no task delete, no list/search of tasks, no way to add or download attachments, and no comment editing. These missing operations could force agents into dead ends for common list/search workflows.