TeamStorm MCP
Related Servers
Alternatives to TeamStorm MCP
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI coding agents to take and progress tasks, hand in completed work with evidence, and enables users to publish, search, and retrieve guides, file bugs, manage inbox/board/activity/logs, and plan tasks over MCP.MIT

@letretro/mcpofficial
AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI coding tools to access LetRetro retrospectives, boards, cards, and team data through MCP.8 npm1MIT- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceEnables AI agents to manage tasks on a local-first board via MCP, exposing task creation, updates, and queries through a thin adapter over the REST service.7MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI agents to manage task state through MCP, including creating, updating, and tracking tasks, with support for client-side encryption and secure local credential storage.381 npmMIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI agents to access unified development tools including code generation, documentation synchronization, test case rendering, and architecture graph queries through a single MCP server.-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI agents to create, read, and manage tasks and projects in a personal todo system through MCP tools.MIT
TDQS
Scored across 15 tools
Most tools target a distinct action on a distinct resource, and the descriptions carefully delineate get_task (by key) from get_task_context (for requirements). The main overlap is update_task versus set_task_description, both of which can change a task's description, though the special templated behavior of the latter differentiates them.
Every tool uses the same teamstorm_ prefix followed by a consistent snake_case verb_noun pattern (create_task, get_comments, schedule_task_closure). The convention is uniform across all 15 tools with no camelCase or stylistic deviations.
15 tools sit at the top of the well-scoped range and each maps to a concrete capability (CRUD on tasks, comments, attachments, links, pages, and closure scheduling). No tool appears redundant with the count.
Core task lifecycle is covered (create/update/read, comments add/get, closure scheduling), but notable gaps exist: no task delete, no list/search of tasks, no way to add or download attachments, and no comment editing. These missing operations could force agents into dead ends for common list/search workflows.