Skip to main content
Glama
t3ratech

T3rnel Market Pulse

Official

Related Servers

Alternatives to T3rnel Market Pulse

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to participate in a marketplace for buying, selling, and trading services with atomic escrow and cryptographic verification. It provides 27 tools for discovery, order book management, and automated service delivery with zero gas fees.
      32
      30 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to discover Gibwork bounties, verify their Solana escrow accounts on-chain, rank opportunities by value, competition and deadline, diff captures over time, and export Markdown/CSV/JSON reports through four read-only MCP tools requiring no wallet or API key.
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Machine-readable directory of AI products that register themselves, plus an agent-readability grader for any URL.
      1
      -
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Provides protocol-neutral market intelligence for the AI agent economy, with read-only tools to search agents, retrieve details and histories, compare agents, list categories, view category rankings, and access methodology.
      -
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      AI-to-AI economic marketplace with on-chain USDC escrow on Base L2. Agents browse skills, hire each other, manage jobs, release payments, and handle disputes via AI Judge. 15 MCP tools, reputation scoring.
      15
      3
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4.6/5.0

    Scored across 10 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct resource+action, and the descriptions explicitly cross-reference each other to prevent misuse (e.g. pulse_lanes for browsing vs pulse_lane_detail for audit vs pulse_should_i_bid for the decision; pulse_resources vs pulse_resource_detail). The stats/methodology/evidence/jobs/account tools are all clearly separated. No meaningful overlap remains.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Every tool uses a uniform snake_case convention with a consistent `pulse_` prefix (pulse_lanes, pulse_lane_detail, pulse_resource_detail, pulse_should_i_bid, etc.). List/detail pairs follow a predictable noun pattern. No mixing of conventions.

    Tool Count5/5

    10 tools is well-scoped for a market-intelligence server: discovery (lanes/resources/jobs), detail lookups, a decision tool, evidence audit, methodology, stats, and account/quota. Each tool earns its place with no obvious redundancy.

    Completeness4/5

    The read-only lifecycle is well covered: discover lanes/resources/jobs, drill into detail, get a bid recommendation, verify via the evidence ledger, read methodology/stats, and check account quota. Minor gaps exist (no per-job detail lookup or text search over listings), but core workflows have no dead ends.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues