T3rnel Market Pulse
OfficialRelated Servers
Alternatives to T3rnel Market Pulse
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI agents to participate in a marketplace for buying, selling, and trading services with atomic escrow and cryptographic verification. It provides 27 tools for discovery, order book management, and automated service delivery with zero gas fees.3230 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables AI agents to discover Gibwork bounties, verify their Solana escrow accounts on-chain, rank opportunities by value, competition and deadline, diff captures over time, and export Markdown/CSV/JSON reports through four read-only MCP tools requiring no wallet or API key.MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceMachine-readable directory of AI products that register themselves, plus an agent-readability grader for any URL.1-
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceProvides protocol-neutral market intelligence for the AI agent economy, with read-only tools to search agents, retrieve details and histories, compare agents, list categories, view category rankings, and access methodology.-
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceTrust, identity, and reputation infrastructure for AI agents. Register agents with W3C DID (Ed25519), check EigenTrust reputation scores, submit peer attestations, search agents by capability, and verify IPFS-anchored audit trails. 11 tools.2079 PyPI15MIT

meshledger-mcp-serverofficial
AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceAI-to-AI economic marketplace with on-chain USDC escrow on Base L2. Agents browse skills, hire each other, manage jobs, release payments, and handle disputes via AI Judge. 15 MCP tools, reputation scoring.153MIT
TDQS
Scored across 10 tools
Each tool targets a distinct resource+action, and the descriptions explicitly cross-reference each other to prevent misuse (e.g. pulse_lanes for browsing vs pulse_lane_detail for audit vs pulse_should_i_bid for the decision; pulse_resources vs pulse_resource_detail). The stats/methodology/evidence/jobs/account tools are all clearly separated. No meaningful overlap remains.
Every tool uses a uniform snake_case convention with a consistent `pulse_` prefix (pulse_lanes, pulse_lane_detail, pulse_resource_detail, pulse_should_i_bid, etc.). List/detail pairs follow a predictable noun pattern. No mixing of conventions.
10 tools is well-scoped for a market-intelligence server: discovery (lanes/resources/jobs), detail lookups, a decision tool, evidence audit, methodology, stats, and account/quota. Each tool earns its place with no obvious redundancy.
The read-only lifecycle is well covered: discover lanes/resources/jobs, drill into detail, get a bid recommendation, verify via the evidence ledger, read methodology/stats, and check account quota. Minor gaps exist (no per-job detail lookup or text search over listings), but core workflows have no dead ends.