Skip to main content
Glama
Sign In
appsmith-mcp

appsmith-mcp

by t0knight
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
JavaScript
Local

navigate

Navigate the attached Firefox tab to a specified URL, resetting the Redux store binding for the Appsmith editor.

Instructions

Navigate the attached Firefox tab to a URL. Resets the Redux store binding.

Tool call template

Replace each placeholder with a value matching the input schema. Only required parameters are included; add optional parameters as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {
      "url": "<url>"
    },
    "name": "navigate"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
urlYes

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observedv0.1.0

TDQS

A3.9/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Without annotations, the description carries full burden. It discloses a key behavioral trait: resetting the Redux store binding. This goes beyond a simple navigation action, but does not cover failure modes or authentication needs.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two concise sentences that front-load the primary action and add a critical behavioral note. No wasted words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple tool with one parameter and no output schema, the description covers the action and a major side effect. It lacks details on failure cases or prerequisites (e.g., that a Firefox tab must be attached), but is largely complete given the tool's simplicity.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters2/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The sole parameter 'url' has no description in the schema (0% coverage). The description only says 'to a URL', adding no additional meaning about format, validation, or constraints. The agent must infer from the parameter name alone.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb 'Navigate' and the resource 'attached Firefox tab to a URL'. It also mentions an important side effect: 'Resets the Redux store binding'. This distinguishes it from sibling tools like get_url and refresh_page.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage for navigating to a URL but does not explicitly state when to use this tool versus alternatives. No exclusions or prerequisites are provided, leaving the agent to infer context.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Deploy Server

Other Tools