mcp-obsidian-vault
Related Servers
Alternatives to mcp-obsidian-vault
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI coding agents to read, write, search, and organize notes in an Obsidian vault directly via the filesystem.132,778 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to interact with Obsidian vaults through direct filesystem access, supporting note management, lightning-fast search with SQLite indexing, image analysis, tag/link management, and bulk operations.MIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI agents to store and retrieve project context, bugs, decisions, and session logs by reading and appending markdown files in a local Obsidian vault, without requiring any cloud services.6MIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI agents to use Obsidian vaults as persistent, bidirectional knowledge workspaces with wikilink/backlink resolution, structured frontmatter/tag indexing, task aggregation, and Obsidian Headless Sync.11MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to interact with Obsidian vaults via direct filesystem access for managing notes, folders, and metadata. It features advanced search capabilities and multi-layer caching to provide efficient, real-time access to your personal knowledge base.2,778 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI agents to securely read and write to an Obsidian-compatible Markdown vault with per-agent access control, audit logging, and conflict resolution.Apache 2.0
TDQS
Scored across 27 tools
Most tools target a distinct resource and action (notes, tasks, agents, usage, git), so boundaries are generally clear. Minor overlap exists between log_discovery/log_decision and manage_tags/update_note, but descriptions make the intended use recognizable.
The overwhelming majority of tools follow a clean verb_noun pattern (create_note, list_tasks, get_usage_report, complete_task). The exceptions are daily_note, git_sync, and wikilinks, which break the pattern but are still readable and predictable.
At 27 tools, this exceeds the 25-tool threshold and feels overloaded for a single MCP server. The server combines note management, task/project management, agent routing, usage tracking, and git operations, which would be better split into separate focused servers.
Notes have full CRUD plus search, tags, wikilinks, daily notes, and git sync, while tasks cover create, claim, update, complete, review, timeouts, and project rollups. Notable gaps include no get_task/delete_task, no update/delete_project, and no explicit agent deactivation, but agents can work around these.