Skip to main content
Glama
t-rhex

mcp-obsidian-vault

by t-rhex

Related Servers

Alternatives to mcp-obsidian-vault

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to interact with Obsidian vaults through direct filesystem access, supporting note management, lightning-fast search with SQLite indexing, image analysis, tag/link management, and bulk operations.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to store and retrieve project context, bugs, decisions, and session logs by reading and appending markdown files in a local Obsidian vault, without requiring any cloud services.
      6
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to use Obsidian vaults as persistent, bidirectional knowledge workspaces with wikilink/backlink resolution, structured frontmatter/tag indexing, task aggregation, and Obsidian Headless Sync.
      11
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to interact with Obsidian vaults via direct filesystem access for managing notes, folders, and metadata. It features advanced search capabilities and multi-layer caching to provide efficient, real-time access to your personal knowledge base.
      2,778 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to securely read and write to an Obsidian-compatible Markdown vault with per-agent access control, audit logging, and conflict resolution.
      Apache 2.0

    TDQS

    A3.6/5.0

    Scored across 27 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools target a distinct resource and action (notes, tasks, agents, usage, git), so boundaries are generally clear. Minor overlap exists between log_discovery/log_decision and manage_tags/update_note, but descriptions make the intended use recognizable.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    The overwhelming majority of tools follow a clean verb_noun pattern (create_note, list_tasks, get_usage_report, complete_task). The exceptions are daily_note, git_sync, and wikilinks, which break the pattern but are still readable and predictable.

    Tool Count2/5

    At 27 tools, this exceeds the 25-tool threshold and feels overloaded for a single MCP server. The server combines note management, task/project management, agent routing, usage tracking, and git operations, which would be better split into separate focused servers.

    Completeness4/5

    Notes have full CRUD plus search, tags, wikilinks, daily notes, and git sync, while tasks cover create, claim, update, complete, review, timeouts, and project rollups. Notable gaps include no get_task/delete_task, no update/delete_project, and no explicit agent deactivation, but agents can work around these.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues