getOneDayTicketSaleInfo
Check if one-day tickets for Shanghai Disney Resort are sold out for any day in the next 30 days.
Instructions
检查一日门票的售卖情况,可以用来查看从今天开始未来30天的门票是否售罄
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Check if one-day tickets for Shanghai Disney Resort are sold out for any day in the next 30 days.
检查一日门票的售卖情况,可以用来查看从今天开始未来30天的门票是否售罄
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are provided, so the description carries full burden. It discloses that the tool checks sale status for a fixed future period, implying a read-only operation. No contradictory or missing behavioral traits.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single, concise sentence that front-loads the key information. It is efficient with no wasted words.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given no output schema and no annotations, the description covers the tool's purpose and scope adequately. However, it does not explicitly describe the return format or behavior (e.g., whether it returns a boolean or structured data). This leaves minor ambiguity.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The tool has zero parameters, so the schema provides no descriptional burden. Baseline of 4 applies as there is nothing to add beyond the schema.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states that the tool checks one-day ticket sale status for the next 30 days. It specifies the resource (一日门票, one-day tickets) and the action (检查售卖情况, check sale status), and distinguishes itself from siblings like getTwoDayTicketSaleInfo.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description explicitly guides when to use: to check if tickets are sold out for the next 30 days from today. It does not include exclusions, but the context is clear, and siblings provide alternatives for two-day tickets.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/syyuan14/sh-disney-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server