capability_set_availability

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries full burden for behavioral disclosure. The description mentions it 'Returns: str: JSON status update + profile terbaru' which provides some output information, but doesn't disclose important behavioral traits: whether this is a mutation (implied by 'update'), what permissions are required, whether changes are reversible, rate limits, or error conditions. For a mutation tool with zero annotation coverage, this leaves significant gaps in understanding how the tool behaves.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is brief (two sentences) and front-loaded with the main purpose. However, it mixes languages (English and Indonesian) which reduces clarity, and the second sentence about return values could be more precisely worded. While concise, the mixed language and vague phrasing prevent it from being optimally efficient.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given that there's an output schema (which should document return values), the description doesn't need to fully explain outputs. However, for a mutation tool with 1 required parameter, 0% schema description coverage, and no annotations, the description should provide more context about what's being updated and why. It mentions the capability card concept but doesn't explain what this represents in the system context.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, meaning the input schema provides no parameter descriptions. The tool description mentions 'availability dan current load' which maps to the two parameters in the schema, but provides no additional semantic context about what these parameters mean, how they interact, or what values are appropriate. The description doesn't compensate for the complete lack of schema documentation, leaving parameters poorly understood.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states 'Update availability dan current load capability card agent ini' which translates to 'Update availability and current load capability card of this agent'. This provides a verb ('update') and resources ('availability', 'current load', 'capability card'), but the phrase 'capability card agent ini' is ambiguous and doesn't clearly distinguish this tool from sibling tools like 'capability_get_self' or 'capability_upsert_self'. The purpose is somewhat clear but lacks specificity about what exactly is being updated.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. There are multiple sibling tools related to capabilities (capability_get_self, capability_remove_self, capability_upsert_self) and agents (agent_broadcast, agent_list, etc.), but no indication of when this specific update tool is appropriate versus those others. No prerequisites, exclusions, or contextual usage hints are provided.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.