Skip to main content
Glama
synthesizer-project

synthia-mcp

Official
by synthesizer-project
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to synthia-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • capability-router

      maybeabhinav
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables agents to search a local catalog, load skills, inspect MCP tool schemas, and invoke selected tools through a single unified MCP tool, reducing per-request overhead.
      1
      MIT

    • MCP Dev MCP

      kongyo2
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables LLM agents to programmatically inspect, debug, and test other MCP servers by wrapping the MCP Inspector CLI. Supports listing and calling tools, reading resources, and testing prompts on both local and remote MCP servers.
      6
      10 npm
      MIT

    • MCP Inspector as MCP Server

      esinecan
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables LLMs to inspect and test other MCP servers by listing and calling their tools, reading resources, and getting prompts. Supports stdio, SSE, and HTTP transports for both local and remote MCP server inspection.
      7
      4 npm
      1
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A4.4/5.0

    Scored across 13 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools are clearly distinct: search vs list vs inspect vs plot families each target different resources and actions. Minor overlap exists between search_documentation and find_example for how-to questions, and the three plot_grid_* tools share a prefix but are differentiated by what they render.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Tool names follow a mostly consistent verb_noun snake_case pattern (search_, list_, inspect_, plot_, describe_, validate_). The main inconsistency is using 'find' vs 'search' for similar lookup actions and 'describe' vs 'inspect' for catalogue vs local metadata, but the pattern remains readable and predictable.

    Tool Count5/5

    13 tools is well-scoped for a server covering documentation search, examples, catalogue browsing, local grid inspection/plotting, environment/API inspection, and script validation. Each tool has a clear role and none feel redundant or like filler.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool surface covers the main workflows: finding docs/examples, discovering and describing catalogue datasets, listing and inspecting local grids, plotting grid outputs, inspecting the environment/API, and validating scripts. Minor gaps exist, such as no tool to return raw spectral/line data as structured values rather than plots, but these are workable limitations rather than dead ends.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources