No user-submitted related servers found.
Scored across 36 tools
Tools are generally well-separated by domain (identity, reputation, recording, witness, claims), with detailed descriptions distinguishing similar functions. A few pairs (e.g., make_claim vs encode_signed, record_interaction vs remember_counterparty) could cause misselection if descriptions are skimmed, but the distinctions are substantive.
Most tools follow a verb_noun snake_case pattern (publish_profile, verify_claim, recording_start), and witness/recording prefixes group related families. Minor deviations include bare verbs 'orient' and 'learn', and a handful of noun-phrase names (attested_reputation, network_reputation), but the overall pattern is predictable.
36 tools is well beyond the 25+ threshold for heavy, even though the toolkit covers a broad trust/identity domain. The count risks overwhelming agents and suggests the surface could be consolidated (e.g., combining witness_* or recording_* into fewer parameterized tools).
The surface is remarkably complete: identity lifecycle, local journal, network reputation, consent, persistence, claims, recordings, witness seals, and blind exchanges are all covered. There are no obvious dead ends, and even edge cases like consent withdrawal and erasure are handled.