Skip to main content
Glama
synopsys0

PostFader V10 — FL Studio MCP Server

Related Servers

Alternatives to PostFader V10 — FL Studio MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      AI control for FL Studio via the Model Context Protocol — full in-DAW mixing (Mix Doctor diagnosis, gain staging, EQ/compression/reverb, reference matching), routing, and composition through Claude and any MCP client. 67 tools. Windows.
      67
      51
      MIT
    • A
      license
      C
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables end-to-end control of FL Studio on macOS through MCP clients, including transport, patterns, mixer, piano roll, playlist, live metering, browser navigation, and rendering.
      160
      MIT
    • A
      license
      C
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Gives AI assistants full control of FL Studio through its scripting API, enabling project editing, mixing, piano roll composition, MIDI export, and plugin automation without touching the mouse or keyboard.
      57
      2
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Local MCP server for FL Studio on macOS, enabling control of projects, transport, mixer, plugins, automation, and piano roll operations.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      Not graded
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to control FL Studio on Windows through a local MCP server without cloud dependencies. Bridges MCP clients to FL Studio's Python scripting environment via file-based IPC for project management, transport control, and UI workflow automation.
      -

    TDQS

    B3.2/5.0

    Scored across 134 tools

    Disambiguation3/5

    Many tools have clear distinct purposes, but there are overlapping tools such as fl_set_plugin_param, fl_set_plugin_param_display, fl_set_plugin_param_option, and fl_apply_verified_batch that may be confused. The postfader_* and mix_* groups also have many similar verbs (create, apply, plan) but are differentiated by domain prefixes.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Most tools follow a consistent verb_noun or domain_verb_noun pattern (e.g., fl_set_mixer_volume, mix_create_plan). There are minor deviations like 'piano_roll_bridge' (noun_verb) and 'copilot_capture_readonly_inspection' (prefix_verb_adj_noun) but overall the pattern is predictable.

    Tool Count2/5

    The server has 134 tools, which is far beyond the typical well-scoped range. While the server covers multiple domains (FL Studio control, audio analysis, composition, rendering), the sheer number suggests insufficient consolidation and will likely overwhelm agents.

    Completeness4/5

    The server covers a wide range of workflows including project state, mixer control, plugin management, composition, audio analysis, and deliverable export. There are some potential gaps like missing explicit delete for certain entities (e.g., no fl_delete_channel or fl_delete_playlist_track), but the lifecycle coverage is generally strong given the domain breadth.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessUnresponsive