Skip to main content
Glama
synjan

mcp-lovdata

by synjan
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
JavaScript
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to mcp-lovdata

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • Icelandic Law MCP

      Ansvar-Systems
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      F
      maintenance
      Provides access to 1,709 Icelandic statutes and 19,026 provisions with full-text search, citation validation, and EU/EEA law integration, enabling legal research and compliance checks through natural language queries.
      11
      38 npm
      1
      Apache 2.0

    • mcp-las

      jaggeman
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables Swedish labor law research and analysis by providing exact statute lookup, hybrid semantic and lexical search, Arbetsdomstolen case law retrieval, and collective agreement comparisons.
      2
      -

    • MutalaaMCP

      hburaktasyurek
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables MCP-compatible AI clients to research official Turkish legal sources locally by searching judicial decisions, legislation, and Constitutional Court decisions, and by retrieving legal documents, individual articles, and legislation structures.
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A4/5.0

    Scored across 12 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each corpus has its own clearly namespaced search/get pair (caselaw_, preparatory_, ombudsman_), and the generic search tool is explicitly scoped to statute paragraphs. get_document vs get_article are also clearly separated by document-level vs article-level retrieval, so there is no real overlap.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    The dominant pattern is clear: `domain_search` and `domain_get` for the three secondary legal sources. However, the main corpus uses get_document and get_article rather than law_document/law_get, and status/sync are bare words that don't follow the verb_noun or domain_action pattern. Still, all names are readable and predictable once the pattern is understood.

    Tool Count5/5

    Twelve tools is well within the ideal range for a legal research server with four distinct source types. Each tool covers a necessary retrieval or maintenance need, and none feel redundant.

    Completeness5/5

    The surface is comprehensive for its stated domain: statute search and retrieval, document listing, article-level detail with history, ECHR case law retrieval, preparatory works, and ombudsman opinions all have search and get coverage. The only notable absence is Norwegian court caselaw, but the tool descriptions explicitly explain that no free machine-readable source exists, so it is a data-availability limitation rather than a design gap.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources