Skip to main content
Glama
syndr

Ara Records MCP Server

by syndr
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
JavaScript
Hybrid

Related Servers

Alternatives to Ara Records MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • AAP MCP Server

      anshulbehl
      F
      license
      C
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables comprehensive management of Ansible Automation Platform Controller and Gateway through 17 specialized tools covering job execution, inventory management, workflows, credentials, user administration, and system monitoring.
      18
      -

    • MCP Ansible Server

      bsahane
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      F
      maintenance
      Enables comprehensive Ansible automation management through natural language, including playbook creation and execution, inventory management, role scaffolding, and project workflows. Supports both local inventories and full project lifecycle management with syntax validation and idempotency testing.
      30
      -

    • Ansible MCP Server

      tarnover
      A
      license
      C
      quality
      F
      maintenance
      This Model Context Protocol server enables AI assistants to interact directly with Ansible, allowing them to execute playbooks, manage inventory, check syntax, and perform other Ansible operations.
      18
      26
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A3.7/5.0

    Scored across 3 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: ara_query is for general API queries, get_playbook_status provides summary status, and watch_playbook offers real-time monitoring with detailed progress. There is no overlap in functionality, making tool selection straightforward for an agent.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    The naming is mostly consistent with a verb_noun pattern (e.g., get_playbook_status, watch_playbook), but ara_query uses a different prefix (ara_) which deviates slightly. Overall, the names are readable and follow a logical structure, with only minor inconsistency.

    Tool Count3/5

    With only 3 tools, the count feels thin for a records or monitoring server, potentially limiting coverage of the domain. While the tools cover key functions, more operations might be expected for comprehensive interaction with Ara records or playbooks.

    Completeness3/5

    The tools cover querying, status checking, and monitoring, but there are notable gaps such as creating, updating, or deleting records or playbooks. This may cause agents to hit dead ends when full lifecycle management is needed, though core monitoring workflows are supported.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources