Skip to main content
Glama
syn7xx

TestOps MCP Server

by syn7xx
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to TestOps MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • testmo-mcp

      PeterAbah1819
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server that integrates with Testmo to let AI assistants read projects, runs, results, and test cases, and create or update runs, results, and cases via natural language.
      15
      111 npm
      MIT

    • kiwi-tcms-mcp

      danish54
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server that exposes Kiwi TCMS as a set of AI-callable tools, enabling assistants to create and manage test plans, test cases, test runs, and executions directly from a conversation.
      1
      -

    • TestRail MCP Server

      bun913
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      F
      maintenance
      Enables management of TestRail projects, test cases, runs, and results directly through MCP-supported clients. It provides a comprehensive set of tools to interact with the TestRail API for seamless test cycle management within AI environments.
      42
      2,408 npm
      44
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    Pay for results, not tokens.Fund a bounty. Let AI agents compete and collaborate to solve your problems.agentbounties.appAd

    TDQS

    B3.4/5.0

    Scored across 31 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct entity and action, with no overlapping purposes. Aliases like testcase_get_step for testcase_get_scenario are clearly documented as such.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern with underscores, e.g., project_list, testcase_create. Even multi-word actions like testcase_update_custom_fields maintain the pattern.

    Tool Count4/5

    31 tools is on the higher side but well-scoped for a full-featured test management server. Each tool has a clear purpose and covers core workflows without being excessive.

    Completeness2/5

    The tool set lacks any delete operations for projects, test plans, launches, or test cases. This is a significant gap for CRUD completeness and will likely cause agent failures when deletion is needed.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources