Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to symbols-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server that exposes the Symbols/DOMQL v3 AI assistant capabilities to any MCP-compatible platform. Enables generating components, pages, projects, and more from natural language, as well as searching documentation and reviewing code.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server for semantic codebase navigation that builds an AST index of symbols, imports, and exports, providing AI agents with tools to search, explore, and understand code.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A comprehensive MCP server providing tools for AI agents to interact with code, including reading symbols, importing modules, replacing text, and sending OS notifications.
      3
      25 npm
      10
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      MCP server that gives AI coding agents codebase navigation intelligence, enabling symbol lookup, reference finding, type inspection, and diagnostics through tools like locate, refs, hover, diagnostics, status, and rename.
      107 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server for codebase intelligence. Point it at any public GitHub repo to ask questions about code with cited answers, search code, files, symbols, and repo stats.
      73 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server for syntx.ai AI platform that enables chat, image generation, model catalog, and account management through any MCP-compatible assistant.
      28
      5
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4/5.0

    Scored across 28 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools have clearly distinct scopes—generation, conversion, audit, fix, and project operations are well-separated. However, a few pairs could confuse an agent: `detect_environment` is explicitly superseded by `get_project_context`, and `get_project` vs `get_project_context` have nearly identical names despite pointing to different data.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    Snake_case is used throughout, but the pattern is inconsistent: most tools are verb_noun (`generate_component`, `list_projects`), yet some are noun-first (`snapshots_frankability`, `frankability_log`) or bare verbs (`publish`, `push`). The `_frankability` suffix creates a recognizable family, but word order varies, making the convention less predictable.

    Tool Count2/5

    At 28 tools, the server exceeds the 25+ threshold that starts to feel like too many. The count is inflated by combining several distinct subdomains—generation, conversion, audit/fix, and platform project management—into one surface. Several reference/context tools (get_project_rules, search_symbols_docs, get_cli_reference, get_sdk_reference) could be consolidated or split into separate servers.

    Completeness4/5

    The server covers the full lifecycle: generate/convert, audit/fix with comprehensive rollback and verification, then save/publish/push to the platform. Minor gaps exist—there is no update/delete project endpoint or direct component deletion, and `detect_environment` duplicates `get_project_context`—but agents can work around these, and the audit-fix loop is exceptionally thorough.

    Maintenance

    ActivityActive
    ResponsivenessUnresponsive