Ghostlight
Related Servers
Alternatives to Ghostlight
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceAn MCP server that lets AI assistants drive real Chromium browsers — navigate, click, type, read pages, run OCR, and record network traffic. 43 tools, credentials stay local, zero telemetry.-
- AlicenseBqualityAmaintenanceMCP server + Chrome extension that gives AI coding agents control of your real browser with existing sessions, logins, and cookies. Works with Cursor, Claude, Windsurf.22337 npm56MIT
- AlicenseAqualityFmaintenanceSelf-hosted MCP server for AI browser automation. Connects to your own Chromium instance via CDP, providing tools for browser control, navigation, interaction, and content extraction.191MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceA local, open-source Chrome browser-automation MCP server for AI agents that controls real signed-in Chrome profiles with multi-profile routing and parallel tabs.802 npm12MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceA zero-dependency MCP server that drives a real Chrome browser through a companion extension, enabling AI agents to automate real user sessions with trusted input events, compact accessibility-tree snapshots, and 14 tools for navigation, interaction, scripting, and inspection.207 npmMIT
- AlicenseBqualityCmaintenanceBrowser MCP server that connects to your existing browser, preserving sessions, passwords, and extensions, enabling AI agents to interact with web pages without bot detection.314 npm1MIT
TDQS
Scored across 25 tools
Multiple tools have overlapping purposes (script vs browser_batch, file_upload vs upload_image, form_input vs form_fill), but descriptions include enough detail to distinguish them with careful reading. An agent may still hesitate on which to choose.
Tool names follow no consistent pattern: some are verb_noun (read_page, upload_image), some are noun_verb (file_upload, form_fill), some are single verbs (navigate, find), and some nouns (computer, dialog). The _mcp suffix appears on only two tab-related tools, while tab_control omits it. This mix makes the naming chaotic.
At 25 tools, the server is on the heavy side of the 16-25 borderline range. However, the broad scope of full browser automation justifies most tools, and each serves a distinct purpose within that domain.
The tool set comprehensively covers the browser automation lifecycle: navigation, reading, interaction, form filling, waiting, tab management, JavaScript execution, network/console inspection, screenshots, dialogs, and even recording. There are no obvious dead ends; the presence of update_plan and explain covers agent coordination and discoverability.