Ghostlight
Related Servers
Alternatives to Ghostlight
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceAn MCP server that lets AI assistants drive real Chromium browsers — navigate, click, type, read pages, run OCR, and record network traffic. 43 tools, credentials stay local, zero telemetry.-
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceMCP server + Chrome extension that gives AI coding agents control of your real browser with existing sessions, logins, and cookies. Works with Cursor, Claude, Windsurf.18120 npm52MIT
- AlicenseAqualityFmaintenanceSelf-hosted MCP server for AI browser automation. Connects to your own Chromium instance via CDP, providing tools for browser control, navigation, interaction, and content extraction.191MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceA zero-dependency MCP server that drives a real Chrome browser through a companion extension, enabling AI agents to automate real user sessions with trusted input events, compact accessibility-tree snapshots, and 14 tools for navigation, interaction, scripting, and inspection.280 npmMIT
- AlicenseBqualityCmaintenanceBrowser MCP server that connects to your existing browser, preserving sessions, passwords, and extensions, enabling AI agents to interact with web pages without bot detection.317 npm1MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceMCP server that enables AI agents to automate browser testing via Chromium, providing tools for navigation, interaction, and inspection.-
TDQS
Scored across 25 tools
Multiple tools have overlapping purposes (script vs browser_batch, file_upload vs upload_image, form_input vs form_fill), but descriptions include enough detail to distinguish them with careful reading. An agent may still hesitate on which to choose.
Tool names follow no consistent pattern: some are verb_noun (read_page, upload_image), some are noun_verb (file_upload, form_fill), some are single verbs (navigate, find), and some nouns (computer, dialog). The _mcp suffix appears on only two tab-related tools, while tab_control omits it. This mix makes the naming chaotic.
At 25 tools, the server is on the heavy side of the 16-25 borderline range. However, the broad scope of full browser automation justifies most tools, and each serves a distinct purpose within that domain.
The tool set comprehensively covers the browser automation lifecycle: navigation, reading, interaction, form filling, waiting, tab management, JavaScript execution, network/console inspection, screenshots, dialogs, and even recording. There are no obvious dead ends; the presence of update_plan and explain covers agent coordination and discoverability.