claudeusage
Related Servers
Alternatives to claudeusage
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables offline, read-only forensic analysis of Claude Code session transcripts, providing exact token usage, cost estimates, context growth, and compaction suggestions.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceReads the Claude Code, Codex and OpenCode usage logs already on your machine and reports token totals, per-day and per-hour activity, a per-agent and per-model breakdown, and a year-in-review recap. It makes no network request at all — a test fails if any source file in the package can open a socket.415MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceAnalyzes Claude Code session token usage and cost locally — where spend actually lands across cache-read, cache-write and output, and what is consuming the context window. Read-only and offline: it parses your own session files and exposes analyze_claude_cost, get_cost_benchmark and tokenscope_share_summary.126 npm4MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceToken usage and estimated cost for Claude Code, Codex, Cursor and 13 more AI coding agents, read locally from their session files. No API key.1AGPL 3.0
- AlicenseBqualityBmaintenanceLets a coding agent inspect its own run efficiency mid-session from local Claude Code transcripts, exposing the share of paid tokens that became model output versus context re-reading. Ships two stdio tools — one returning the shares as structured data and one returning the full cost-weighted report — with no network calls.240 PyPIMIT
- AlicenseAqualityNot gradedmaintenanceProvides real-time visibility into Claude Pro and Max subscription usage limits directly within Claude Code by utilizing local OAuth tokens. It enables users to monitor session and weekly usage across different models and receive alerts regarding rate-limiting status.4-
TDQS
Scored across 4 tools
subscription_value and current_limits are clearly distinct, and the detailed descriptions make limit_breakdown and chat_share distinguishable as mechanism analysis vs. cross-product attribution. An agent skimming names alone could conflate the two rate-limit tools, but the descriptions resolve the ambiguity.
All four names are lowercase snake_case compound nouns, which gives the set a consistent shape. The convention is not verb_noun like typical action tools, and chat_share is a bit ambiguous semantically, but there is no jarring style mixing.
Four tools is compact but each one earns its place: local usage value, limit drivers, chat attribution, and live limit status. The server scope is narrow enough that this feels well-scoped rather than thin.
The set covers the core workflows: measuring local value, explaining limit consumption, attributing non-local usage, and querying current limits. The main gap is that current_limits can record samples to a log, but no tool reads that history back for time-series analysis.