Skip to main content
Glama
sydacos-development

@trigvale/mcp

by sydacos-development
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
JavaScript
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to @trigvale/mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • Obra CTO

      lilycip
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A local-first MCP server that scores your codebase's Build Readiness by reading code and running tests on your machine, outputting a diligence-grade score and risk register without uploading your source.
      5
      53 npm
      Apache 2.0

    • openvaluation

      yagebin79386
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Provides startup valuation methods with auditable calculations, readiness checks, and explanations through MCP tools.
      MIT

    • Rapidly MCP

      Exponentially-Platform
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to guide users through pretotyping, turning raw ideas into Lean Canvases, testable hypotheses, and small experiments to validate demand before building.
      1
      MIT

    • PitchLink MCP

      erenozdemirrr
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server that reads startup pitch drafts from Notion to provide comprehensive investor-style analysis and scoring. It evaluates key areas like market opportunity and team strength, delivering feedback through a visual dashboard.
      -
    • NUVC MCP Server by nuvcai

      NUVC MCP Serverofficial

      nuvcai
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Provides VC-grade startup intelligence, allowing founders to validate ideas and VCs to screen deals using tools like scoring, investor matching, and financial analysis.
      11 npm
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A4.1/5.0

    Scored across 1 tool

    Disambiguation5/5

    With only one tool, there is no possibility of confusion between tools. The single tool has a distinct and clear purpose.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    The single tool 'validate_idea' follows a clear verb_noun pattern and is descriptive. However, with only one tool, consistency across multiple tools cannot be fully assessed.

    Tool Count3/5

    One tool is borderline for the implied domain of startup building. While the validation step is specific, a broader lifecycle (e.g., scaffolding) is suggested but not covered, making the count feel thin.

    Completeness2/5

    The tool covers only idea validation. Obvious gaps exist, such as tools for scaffolding, iteration, or testing, which are referenced in the description but not provided. This will likely cause agent failures after validation.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources