cycle_folders_update

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided. The description only states 'Update', implying mutation, but does not disclose side effects, permissions required, or whether changes are reversible. For a mutation tool with zero annotation coverage, this is insufficient.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely concise (one line plus a tag), but this comes at the cost of missing essential information. It is not verbose, but it is under-specified, which reduces its utility.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the absence of output schema, low parameter coverage, and lack of usage context, the description fails to provide a complete picture. It does not mention return values, constraints (e.g., valid values for order), or relationships with other entities like cycles.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is only 25% (only 'id' has a description). The description adds no additional meaning to parameters like 'name', 'order', or 'parentId'. It does not compensate for the low schema coverage, leaving the agent without guidance on parameter semantics.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states 'Update cycle folder', which is a specific verb+resource pairing. It distinguishes from siblings like create, delete, get, list by indicating a modification operation. However, it could be more specific about which fields are updatable.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives (e.g., cycle_folders_create or cycle_folders_get). No prerequisites or conditions for use are mentioned.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.