On Board
Related Servers
Alternatives to On Board
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceMCP server enabling AI agents to coordinate on a shared board: they can declare work, exchange typed messages, transfer files, and hold advisory claims, preventing duplicate effort across agents.2Apache 2.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceA vendor-neutral MCP server that enables coding agents to delegate tasks, share context, and work as a team through a shared blackboard and task queue.14MIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceAn MCP server that turns independent AI agents into a coordinated engineering team with shared task board, context, review loop, and enforced plan-implement-review-iterate workflow.24MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceAn MCP server that provides shared memory, kanban board, and agent registry for AI agents to collaborate as a team, with a live dashboard for human oversight.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceMCP server for coordinating multiple AI agents across developers and vendors with a shared job board, per-file locking, and live project context.5AGPL 3.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityFmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol (MCP) server that enables multiple AI agents to share memory, coordinate tasks, and collaborate effectively across IDEs and CLI tools.1916MIT
TDQS
Scored across 30 tools
Multiple tools have overlapping purposes: memory_init, memory_bootstrap, memory_onboard, and memory_agent_join all serve onboarding or initialization roles. Similarly, memory_search, memory_search_vector, and memory_search_archive are three search variants, and memory_status, memory_token_usage, and memory_doctor all provide health/status information. While descriptions clarify some differences, the boundaries between these tools are not immediately obvious, creating selection ambiguity.
All tool names follow a strict `memory_` prefix followed by a verb_noun pattern, using snake_case throughout (e.g., memory_create_ticket, memory_read, memory_search_archive). This is highly consistent and predictable, making it easy to infer the action and target of each tool.
At 30 tools, the server feels over-scoped. Many tools are highly specialized and could be merged or parameterized, such as the three search tools or the multiple onboarding variants (memory_init, memory_bootstrap, memory_onboard). The count exceeds the threshold for 'too many' (25+), which burdens agents with a large surface to navigate.
The tool set covers core memory and ticket workflows thoroughly: memory lifecycle (write, read, search, compact, archive, checkpoint), ticket lifecycle (create, claim, submit, review, cancel, terminate, list), and collaboration features (handoff, briefing, agent_join). Minor gaps exist, such as no explicit memory deletion (only unpin) and no direct ticket editing, but these are workable with existing tools.