Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to smart-fhir

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Provides safe read-only access to synthetic healthcare data via FHIR R4, enabling AI assistants to search patients, retrieve vitals, and summarize conditions using a public sandbox.
      4
      7 npm
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Connects MCP clients to FHIR R4+ clinical APIs over SMART on FHIR v2 Backend Services, exposing resources, named operations, terminology lookup, and pagination as configurable tools. It adds metadata- and scope-aware search/CRUD, compact responses with FHIRPath filtering, safe pagination, audit events, and bundle execution.
      139 npm
      17
      -
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to securely interact with FHIR R4 servers for clinical decision support workflows, including PlanDefinition execution, FHIR resource management, terminology services, and Questionnaire/StructureMap transformation via Matchbox.
      1
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      This MCP server enables secure, read-only access to synthetic preventive-care patient records and bounded IRIS namespace health metrics through a small set of allowlisted, parameterized tools.
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.6/5.0

    Scored across 4 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct function: smart_discover retrieves server metadata, fhir_auth_status reports client-side authentication state, fhir_search performs list queries, and fhir_read fetches individual resources. There is no overlap or ambiguity between the four operations.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Tools use a consistent prefix pattern (smart_ for auth/discovery, fhir_ for data operations) and each suffix clearly indicates the action (discover, auth_status, search, read). While the prefixes differ by domain, the overall structure is predictable and not chaotic.

    Tool Count4/5

    Four tools is on the lower end but appropriate for a narrowly scoped read-only FHIR access server focused on discovery and basic querying. It avoids bloat while covering the primary use cases.

    Completeness3/5

    The server covers read and search for a limited set of resources, but lacks pagination (only one page), search parameters beyond resource type, and a capability statement. Given the explicit read-only nature, core operations are present but notable gaps exist in search depth and server metadata.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues