suzi-agri-mcp
Server Configuration
Describes the environment variables required to run the server.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Instructions
Guidance the server publishes about itself, which clients place ahead of the tool catalog so the model reads it before choosing anything.
This server publishes no instructions, or was last inspected before Glama recorded them.
Capabilities
Features and capabilities supported by this server
Protocol revision2025-11-25
| Capability | Details |
|---|---|
| tools | {} |
Tools
Functions exposed to the LLM to take actions
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
| suzi_weatherB | 获取中国农业产区实时气象+7天预报+NASA POWER 30年气候基准（免费双源，覆盖泸州/合江/龙马潭等11个预设产区，支持任意中文地名回落川南坐标） |
| suzi_weather_alertsA | 扫描未来7天气象并输出农事预警事件（暴雨/高温/霜冻/大风），含等级与建议动作。⚠️ 阈值为待校准推断参考值 |
Prompts
Interactive templates invoked by user choice
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No prompts | |
Resources
Contextual data attached and managed by the client
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No resources | |
TDQS
Scored across 2 tools
The two tools have distinct purposes: suzi_weather fetches meteorological data while suzi_weather_alerts derives actionable warning events. There is mild conceptual overlap since alerts depend on the same weather data, but an agent can clearly choose between them.
Both tools use a consistent snake_case pattern with the shared suzi_ prefix and weather stem. The only minor deviation is the redundant double 'weather' in suzi_weather_alerts, but the pattern is predictable.
Two tools is thin for a server branded as an agriculture MCP; the surface is essentially a single weather-data capability plus a derivative alerts view. It is not extreme, but it feels under-scoped for the stated domain.
Coverage is limited to weather and weather-derived alerts, with no soil, planting calendars, crop advice, or market/production data that an 'agri-mcp' would be expected to provide. There are significant gaps beyond the weather vertical.