Agent Context MCP
Related Servers
Alternatives to Agent Context MCP
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables coding agents in different editors and MCP clients to share messages, project context, notes, task ownership, handoffs, and advisory file claims through a local SQLite-backed coordination server. Supports MCP stdio, MCP Streamable HTTP, a JSON HTTP API, and a local CLI for multi-project agent collaboration.MIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceLocal-first task and progress database shared by developers and coding agents. Agents claim ready tasks over MCP, record progress and handoffs,and submit commits for independent review; developers confirm, prioritize, and approve work in a local web dashboard. Data stays in a SQLite file inside your project, with no cloud service or account required.15309 npm11Apache 2.0
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceA local-first MCP server and CLI that gives coding agents structured project memory, task contracts, context packs, backlog workflows, and verification evidence, storing data in reviewable Markdown/YAML with a fast SQLite index.4-
- AlicenseBqualityAmaintenanceLets multiple AI agents and parallel coding sessions share one memory and task ledger, so they can claim work instead of duplicating it, resume each other's handoffs and reasoning, and use credentials without ever seeing the keys. Connects assistants such as Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, Gemini, ChatGPT and custom agents over MCP, backed by a single local SQLite file or a self-hosted Postgres hub.35MIT
- AlicenseCqualityCmaintenanceEnables coding agents to coordinate around shared project context, durable tasks, messages, artifacts, multimodal analysis requests, design-system checks, change proposals, and review requests through a compact MCP interface. It persists state locally in JSON and exposes tools, resources, and prompts for agent-to-agent workflows.9MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceLocal dashboard and MCP server that maintains a live project registry and skill library, enabling coding agents to pull project context and automatically update status, stack, and next steps.-
TDQS
Scored across 10 tools
The two resources (projects/events vs. tasks) are cleanly separated, and record_update vs. update_task are distinguishable by their descriptions (append-only event log vs. live task lease). The main soft spot is get_context vs. get_updates vs. search_context, which all return context-ish data and rely on prose to differentiate them.
Every tool follows a consistent snake_case verb_noun pattern (create_project, list_projects, get_context, record_update, claim_task, update_task), with parallel create/list pairs for both resources. The verbs are semantically appropriate rather than mechanically duplicated, which is a plus.
Ten tools is well within the sweet spot and each maps to a distinct operation (two project ops, three read/search ops, one record op, four task ops). Nothing feels redundant or missing at the count level.
The core lifecycle is covered: project creation/listing, an event log with cursor-based reads and search, and a full task flow from create through claim to completion. Gaps exist — no get_project/get_task for a single record and no archive/delete or explicit lease-release operation — but agents can work around these via list_tasks/list_projects and update_task.