Skip to main content
Glama
suryanandan1

Gmail MCP Server

by suryanandan1
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to Gmail MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • workspace-ai

      faizansid3
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to interact with Gmail accounts via MCP, providing tools for listing labels, searching, reading, drafting, and sending emails with OAuth2 authentication.
      -

    • gmail-mcp

      hahaha-saygex
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to manage Gmail emails, including sending, searching, and organizing with labels and attachments via OAuth2.
      48 npm
      1
      MIT

    • Gmail MCP Server

      XEW25
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to manage Gmail accounts through natural language for tasks like sending, reading, searching, and organizing emails. It supports advanced features including draft management, label operations, and batch actions via secure OAuth 2.0 authentication.
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    C2.9/5.0

    Scored across 10 tools

    Disambiguation3/5

    Gmail-specific tools have distinct purposes, but the inclusion of add_numbers and echo_text creates a confusing mix of unrelated functionalities, potentially causing an agent to select the wrong tool.

    Naming Consistency2/5

    Most Gmail tools follow a gmail_verb_noun pattern, but health_check, add_numbers, and echo_text break this convention, leading to inconsistent naming.

    Tool Count3/5

    With 10 tools, the count is reasonable for a Gmail integration, but the presence of two test tools inflates the count unnecessarily and feels out of place.

    Completeness2/5

    The tool surface lacks essential operations like deleting messages, managing labels, or updating drafts, leaving significant gaps for a comprehensive email workflow.

    Maintenance

    ActivityStale
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources