Skip to main content
Glama
surendranb

macOS Companion MCP Server

by surendranb
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to macOS Companion MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • hammerspoon-mcp

      mobabur94
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Give AI agents deep control over macOS — windows, audio, Bluetooth, Spaces, Focus mode, and 200+ OS APIs — through one MCP server.
      22 npm
      1
      MIT

    • lnwjud

      Jitwisut
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to securely access local development capabilities such as files, Git, processes, browser control, Windows automation, WSL, and observability through MCP on Windows and macOS.
      MIT

    • mcp-computer-use

      TJCurnutte
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enterprise-grade macOS MCP server that gives AI agents eyes, hands, and a terminal, enabling screen capture, mouse/keyboard control, shell commands, and file operations.
      -

    • macos-control-mcp

      vito1317
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server that enables AI to fully control macOS — mouse, keyboard, terminal, screenshots, window management, UI element detection, and provides AI-optimized information reporting.
      36
      23 npm
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    B3.3/5.0

    Scored across 40 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools target distinct apps and actions, but there is overlap among system monitoring tools (get_system_stats, get_battery_health, run_health_audit) and storage tools (get_disk_usage, get_storage_scan) that could cause misselection without careful reading.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    The naming largely follows verb_noun snake_case (list_calendars, create_reminder), with minor deviations like play_pause_music (verb_verb) and get_storage_scan (noun-heavy). Overall predictable.

    Tool Count2/5

    40 tools is excessive for a single server, even with broad macOS scope. Many tools could be split into separate domain-specific servers (calendar, system, podcasts). This makes the surface heavy to navigate.

    Completeness3/5

    Core operations exist for most apps (create, read, list), but lifecycle coverage is incomplete: Calendar/Reminders/Notes lack delete, Music lacks queue control, Mail lacks folder/search operations. The podcast tools are unusually thorough, but other areas feel thin.

    Maintenance

    ActivityActive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources