list_schemas
List all schemas in a PostgreSQL database to view database organization. Helps with schema discovery and database analysis.
Instructions
List all schemas in the database
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
List all schemas in a PostgreSQL database to view database organization. Helps with schema discovery and database analysis.
List all schemas in the database
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided, so description carries the burden. As a simple read-only listing, the description is adequate but does not explicitly state it is non-destructive or clarify return behavior (e.g., returns schema names only).
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single sentence, clearly front-loaded with verb and resource, no wasted words.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a zero-parameter, read-only listing tool without output schema, the description is complete. It sufficiently informs the agent of its function.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Tool has 0 parameters and schema description coverage is 100% (empty). No parameter information needed; baseline score is appropriate.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Description clearly states 'List all schemas in the database' with a specific verb (List) and resource (schemas). It inherently distinguishes from sibling tools that list other entities like relations or objects.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as list_relations or list_objects. The description does not provide context or exclusions.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/surajmandalcell/pgsql-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server