Skip to main content
Glama
Sign In
superzeldalink

Typleaf MCP Server

by superzeldalink
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to Typleaf MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • Overleaf CE MCP Server

      alanmagno1
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants and agents to explore, read, live-edit, patch, create, and delete files across projects on a self-hosted Overleaf Community Edition deployment, with OT-safe edits that sync instantly to open browser tabs. It also triggers server-side LaTeX compilations, returns parsed errors and warnings from the log for auto-debugging, and delivers authenticated PDF download links.
      MIT

    • typst-app-mcp

      Raindancer118
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables an AI assistant to read and edit online Typst projects, including managing files, projects, share links and members, and threaded comments, while preserving concurrent browser edits. Also compiles documents locally to PDF, PNG or SVG with file:line diagnostics and inline page previews.
      26
      MIT

    • letX MCP Server

      Shahriar-Labs
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Connects an AI assistant to a user's account so they can search a LaTeX template library, create and edit projects and their files, and compile documents to PDF with errors reported by file and line. Includes tools for listing projects, setting the TeX engine, and keeping version history when a file is replaced.
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A3.6/5.0

    Scored across 29 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools target a distinct action/resource combination, and the descriptions clearly separate edit_file, rewrite_file, update_section, and write_files. status_summary, project_info, and get_sections have some overlap in reporting headings or project overview, but the descriptions provide enough guidance to choose correctly.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    The tool set predominantly follows a clear verb_noun pattern such as list_files, create_file, delete_file, and download_pdf. A few noun-style names like status_summary, project_info, and section_page_map are minor deviations that do not obscure the overall pattern.

    Tool Count2/5

    With 29 tools, the surface exceeds the 25+ threshold and feels heavy for an agent to navigate. Many tools are individually justified, but there are several closely related variants around editing, downloading, and PDF mapping that increase selection cost.

    Completeness4/5

    The core document lifecycle is well covered: project creation, file CRUD, editing, compilation, PDF/log retrieval, page mapping, citation verification, and git operations. Minor gaps such as deleting or renaming projects and moving files are workaround-able and not central to the primary compile-edit workflow.

    Maintenance

    ActivityStale
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources