sitemap
Retrieve all linked pages from a given URL to discover site structure and related content.
Instructions
Get all related links from a URL
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| url | Yes | URL to get sitemap |
Retrieve all linked pages from a given URL to discover site structure and related content.
Get all related links from a URL
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| url | Yes | URL to get sitemap |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided, so description must fully disclose behavior. It only says 'Get all related links' without specifying scope, format, or potential side effects (e.g., rate limits, dynamic content handling).
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single sentence with no wasted words, but it is so brief that it lacks sufficient detail—under-specified rather than efficient.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given no annotations, no output schema, and minimal parameter info, the description fails to provide enough context for correct usage. Missing return value format, limitations, and appropriate usage scenarios.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100% with only one parameter described as 'URL to get sitemap'. Tool description adds no additional meaning beyond the schema's own description; no extra constraints, examples, or context.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Description uses a specific verb 'Get' and resource 'related links from a URL', but 'related links' is vague—does it mean all links on the page, or sitemap XML links? Lacks sharp distinction from siblings.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like 'crawl' or 'search'. No explicit when-to or when-not-to information.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/superagents-lab/search1api-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server