Skip to main content
Glama
sunwen1983

mcpgate

by sunwen1983
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Go
Hybrid

Related Servers

Alternatives to mcpgate

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • mcp-streamable-http-bridge

      elad-bar
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Bridges stdio Model Context Protocol (MCP) servers to MCP Streamable HTTP behind a single gateway, enabling multi-tenant, multi-user deployment with per-tenant environment variables via HTTP headers.
      MIT
    • AISIX AI Gateway by api7

      AISIX AI Gatewayofficial

      api7
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Self-hosted MCP gateway that registers upstream MCP servers and fronts them behind one governed Streamable HTTP endpoint: per-tool access control by caller API key, guardrails over tool arguments and results, rate limits, and usage logs. The same Rust gateway also proxies LLM and A2A agent traffic.
      1
      200
      Apache 2.0

    • mcpgateway

      calasdan-sketch
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Fronts many downstream MCP servers through one session, presenting a unified tool namespace with collision resolution, fleet-wide allow/deny/hide policy, per-tool rate limits, centralized audit logging, Prometheus metrics, and bearer-key auth at the edge. Supports both stdio drop-in and Streamable HTTP deployment so agents point at a single endpoint instead of N servers.
      MIT

    • MCPay

      yiaany
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      High-performance Go gateway and reverse proxy for Model Context Protocol servers with rate-limiting, authorization, and pay-per-result metering.
      33 npm
      15
      MIT

    • MCP Gateway

      cociweb
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Aggregates multiple upstream MCP servers (stdio, streamable-http, sse, websocket) behind a single streamable-HTTP endpoint with declarative configuration, namespacing, filtering, and auto-reload.
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    Context Every Agent Can ShareAgents share what they learn, hand off work, and keep it when you switch models. Start with 5 GB free.fulcradynamics.comAd

    TDQS

    B3.3/5.0

    Scored across 2 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    echo and add target completely different operations (returning text vs arithmetic), so there is no risk of misselection. Each tool has a single, clearly distinct purpose.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Both names are single lowercase verbs (echo, add), following a clean and predictable pattern. The convention is minimal but perfectly consistent.

    Tool Count3/5

    Two tools is very thin even for a gateway server; the surface feels like a demo rather than a functional set. It earns a borderline score rather than being egregiously mismatched.

    Completeness2/5

    There is no discernible domain to cover—echo and add are unrelated utility stubs with no lifecycle or workflow. This leaves significant gaps for almost any real use case.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources