Skip to main content
Glama
sundonglai03

mysql-mcp

by sundonglai03
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to mysql-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • Universal Database MCP

      Jorge-240
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables MCP clients to dynamically connect to MySQL, MariaDB, and PostgreSQL databases via connection URLs, and to administer databases, tables, and records.
      -

    • MySQL MCP Server

      slg1119
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Provides MySQL database integration for AI assistants and other MCP clients, allowing them to list tables, read table data, and execute SQL queries.
      -

    • Local MySQL Read-only MCP

      YaangHailong
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Provides a read-only interface to local MySQL databases via MCP, enabling listing databases, tables, describing schemas, and querying rows with structured filters.
      -

    • mysql-mcp-demo

      Khushboo-Mishra
      -
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables interaction with a MySQL database through MCP tools, resources, and prompts, supporting both read-only queries and safe write operations.
      -

    • mysql-mcp-server

      bomsan69
      F
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server that lets clients run SQL (select/insert/update/delete) against a MySQL database, with readonly and readwrite modes.
      4
      -
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    D1.8/5.0

    Scored across 11 tools

    Disambiguation2/5

    Several tools have unclear boundaries: execute_sql and execute_query appear to do nearly the same thing, and fetch_table may overlap with execute_query for reading data. An agent could easily select the wrong generic tool despite the clear CRUD/schema tools.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Most names follow a predictable verb_noun snake_case pattern (list_tables, count_rows, delete_rows). Minor inconsistencies exist, such as insert_row singular vs update_rows/delete_rows pluralched and execute_sql vs execute_query using different nouns for the same conceptual operation.

    Tool Count4/5

    11 tools is a reasonable size for a database MCP server case. However, execute_sql and execute_query are redundant, so not every tool clearly earns its place.

    Completeness4/5

    The set covers health, database/table listing, schema inspection, row CRUD, counting, and arbitrary SQL, so core database operations are well covered. Dedicated table lifecycle operations are missing but can be handled through execute_sql, making this a minor gap rather than a fatal one.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources