Skip to main content
Glama
sumyapp
by sumyapp

Related Servers

Alternatives to playwright-parallel-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to control isolated Chromium browser identities, allowing per-account navigation, interaction, and inspection through MCP without requiring Node or CLI installation.
      2
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Multi-session browser MCP server that gives AI agents up to 15 fully-isolated browsers running in parallel. 36 tools including navigation, extraction, network intercept, stealth, and self-improvement. Each session has its own cookies, storage, and fingerprint so agents never collide.
      37
      20 npm
      5
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server for managing and controlling multiple isolated Chrome/Edge browser instances, exposing tools for navigation, screenshots, clicking, form filling, and JavaScript execution to AI clients.
      3 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      A local, open-source MCP server that enables AI clients to control multiple isolated Chromium browser sessions concurrently, with explicit session and page addressing and independent state.
      35
      35 npm
      4
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Multi-instance parallel browser MCP server that manages multiple isolated browser instances in a single Chrome process with automatic login state cloning, allowing parallel independent operations across instances.
      36
      MIT

    TDQS

    B3/5.0

    Scored across 27 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct operation in browser automation: navigation, clicking, typing, selecting, dragging, dropping, uploading, snapshotting, network inspection, and console messages. Even similar tools like browser_evaluate and browser_run_code_unsafe are clearly differentiated by their execution context (page vs server).

    Naming Consistency3/5

    Most tools follow a 'browser_' prefix, but the suffix is inconsistent: some use verbs (navigate, click, hover) while others use nouns (snapshot, screenshot, console_messages). Session management tools (create_session, list_sessions, close_session) deviate entirely from the prefix pattern, creating a mixed convention.

    Tool Count3/5

    With 27 tools, the server is on the heavier side, but the breadth covers a full browser automation workflow including interactions, network, console, dialogs, and session management. The count is justified by the domain, though it exceeds the typical well-scoped range.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool set covers the core browser automation lifecycle: navigation, interactions, snapshots, waiting, tabs, file uploads, and network inspection. Minor gaps like forward navigation or explicit scrolling can be worked around via browser_evaluate or browser_navigate, so there are no dead ends.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessUnresponsive