Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to @instantreply/mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Connects a user's existing LinkedIn, WhatsApp, Instagram, Telegram, email and calendar accounts to any MCP-compatible agent so it can search, read and act on them without browser automation, including outreach, messaging, inbox triage and event management. It provides 170+ intent-named tools with OAuth 2.1 authentication, per-provider pacing, and approval prompts before sends, posts or deletions.
      MIT
    • F
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables agents to interact with Instagram through 49 tools for direct messages, feed, profiles, search, and persona discovery, with write actions disabled by default until explicitly enabled.
      4
      49
      -
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables users to send, retrieve, search, and manage Instagram Direct Messages and related media, threads, users, stories, likes, followers, following, and posts from their Instagram account through MCP tools.
      -
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server that wraps Meta's Messenger Platform, Instagram Messaging, and comment moderation APIs as semantic tools for LLM agents to read inbox, reply, and moderate comments.
      16
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Exposes Instagram actions (posts, media, comments, DMs, insights, Messenger profile) to Claude and ChatGPT via MCP.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      WhatsApp, Instagram, Telegram, SMS, Messenger & email in one AI-ready inbox. Manage conversations, send omnichannel messages, run campaigns, sync contacts, and query your knowledge base — 42 tools over a hosted, OAuth-secured MCP server.
      1
      MIT

    TDQS

    B3.4/5.0

    Scored across 31 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools target a distinct resource+action, and descriptions carefully differentiate near-neighbors (single vs batch journeys, draft vs stored template validation). However, pairs like submit_template vs submit_stored_template and send_whatsapp_template vs trigger_journey have fuzzy boundaries that could cause misselection.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Nearly every tool follows a predictable snake_case verb_noun pattern (get_/list_/send_/trigger_/validate_/submit_/delete_). The few outliers (recommend_plan, explain_delivery_failure, check_journey_status) still conform to verb-first naming, so there is no convention mixing.

    Tool Count3/5

    31 tools is on the heavy side and pushes past the comfortable range, with several closely related variants (two validators, two submitters, single vs batch journey triggers). The genuinely broad domain (conversations, contacts, templates, journeys, analytics, developer tooling) partially justifies the count, but some consolidation is possible.

    Completeness4/5

    The surface covers full lifecycle for templates and journeys, plus conversation handling, analytics, and developer onboarding/limits/capabilities. Minor gaps exist—no contact creation/deletion and no channel connect/disconnect—but agents can work around these.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessResponsive