infoset-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to infoset-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceMCP server for amoCRM integration, enabling AI assistants to manage leads, contacts, companies, tasks, and more via natural language.4MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceMCP server for integrating AI assistants with Bitrix24, enabling retrieval and management of CRM entities, tasks, scrum, and knowledge bases through natural language.5 npm1-
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceMCP server for Creatio CRM that enables AI assistants to read, create, update, delete records, execute business processes, and manage settings via OData and REST APIs.1830 npm6MIT
- FlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceMCP server for the Nimbus helpdesk that enables an AI assistant to manage support tickets, search cases, escalate issues, send responses, and track SLA compliance.3-
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceA comprehensive MCP server that connects AI assistants to GoHighLevel CRM, enabling management of contacts, conversations, calendars, pipelines, payments, and more through 60+ tools.6439 npm1MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceMCP server for Nimbus Operations Copilot that enables AI agents to search help docs, customer data, invoices, and tickets, and propose refunds/tickets with human approval for writes.-
TDQS
Scored across 16 tools
Most tools are distinct, with clear single vs batch and get vs list/search separations. The only potential confusion is between list_tickets and search_tickets, but their descriptions (filters vs keyword) delineate their purposes.
All tool names follow the consistent pattern infoset_<verb>_<noun>, using snake_case throughout. Verbs like get, list, search, create, update, and batch_get are used predictably, and batch operations are uniformly prefixed with 'batch_get'.
With 16 tools, the server is slightly over the typical 3-15 range, but the domain encompasses tickets, contacts, companies, emails, and SLA data, justifying the count. The batch operations add a few extra tools but serve a clear performance purpose.
Core ticket workflows (create, read, update, list, search, logs, SLA) are covered, along with contact/company read operations. Minor gaps exist such as no delete endpoints and no write operations for contacts or companies, but these do not impede primary use cases.