Ploi MCP Server
Related Servers
Alternatives to Ploi MCP Server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityNot gradedmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to manage cloud infrastructure through natural language by providing a unified interface to the Dokploy platform. Supports Docker containers, applications, databases, domains, monitoring, and deployment operations through conversational commands.26 npm1-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to manage Dokploy deployments, including creating and deploying applications, managing databases, configuring domains with SSL, and monitoring application status through a standardized interface.26 npmMIT
- FlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceEnables managing Ploi.io servers, sites, databases, and Docker containers through the Ploi API, supporting both local stdio and remote Cloudflare Worker deployments with multi-tenant authentication.32-
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to fully manage Laravel Forge servers, sites, databases, workers, daemons, SSL certificates, and deployments.391,188 npmMIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to manage SpinupWP infrastructure, including servers, WordPress sites, and SSH keys through the SpinupWP v1 JSON API. Users can perform actions like provisioning sites, purging caches, and restarting services via natural language commands.17MIT
- FlicenseBqualityCmaintenanceEnables deploying sites, managing databases, and troubleshooting deployments on Hostwares from AI assistants.14-
TDQS
Scored across 46 tools
Each tool targets a distinct resource and action (e.g., create_cron, list_servers, restart_queue). Even similar operations like deploy_project and deploy_site are clearly differentiated by scope. No overlapping purposes.
All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern using underscores (create_, delete_, get_, list_, etc.). No mixing of conventions or inconsistent verbs.
46 tools is significantly higher than the recommended range. While the server covers many subdomains, the count feels excessive for an MCP server and likely includes operations that could be merged or omitted.
The tool set provides comprehensive CRUD and lifecycle coverage for servers, sites, databases, cron, daemons, queues, certificates, backups, and deployment workflows. Minor gaps exist (e.g., no update_site or update_database), but core user workflows are well-supported.