get_v1_media_comment_replies_by_id

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, and the description does not disclose behavioral traits such as rate limits, authentication needs, or error behavior. It only mentions the HTTP method in parentheses, which is already implied by the name.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely short but fails to be concise in a meaningful way; it merely restates the name. It is under-specified and does not earn its place.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the missing output schema, lack of annotations, and 4 parameters with pagination logic, the description is severely incomplete. It does not explain what the tool returns or how to use pagination effectively.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The description contains zero parameter-level information, despite 4 parameters being defined in the schema. It does not explain the role of 'count' and 'cursor' for pagination, nor the pattern constraints on media_id and comment_id.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description repeats the tool name and HTTP method, but does not clarify what 'Media Comment Replies By Id' returns or how it relates to sibling tools like get_v1_media_comments_by_id. It lacks specificity and differentiation.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. It does not specify prerequisites, such as requiring a media_id and comment_id, nor does it indicate typical use cases.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.