Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to ToolMux

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Aggregates multiple MCP servers into a single interface, reducing token overhead and simplifying tool management for LLMs.
      6
      197 npm
      18
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables aggregating multiple MCP servers behind a single HTTP/SSE endpoint, with Code Mode to reduce token usage and support for OAuth and sandboxed execution.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Aggregates multiple MCP servers into a single endpoint, enabling LLM clients to access tools, resources, and prompts from various backends through one connection.
      6 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Self-hosted MCP gateway that aggregates many MCP servers into a single endpoint for AI clients, supporting hosted, local stdio, and Git-sourced MCPs.
      1
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Aggregates multiple shared MCP servers into a single HTTP gateway, providing a unified, observable, and reusable MCP access layer for multiple AI clients like Codex, OpenCode, and OpenClaw. It centralizes configuration management, logging, health checks, and circuit breaking to simplify multi-client MCP deployments.
      5
      -
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Aggregates multiple MCP servers and custom Python tools behind a single endpoint, with intelligent context and tool discovery for AI agents.
      -

    TDQS

    B3.2/5.0

    Scored across 7 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools have clearly distinct purposes: introspection (get_tool_schema, get_tool_count, list_all_tools), server management (manage_servers), and description optimization (optimize_descriptions). However, 'filesystem' and 'brave-search' are ambiguous as they appear to be single tools but actually represent bundled servers, making their usage boundaries unclear.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    Five tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern (get_tool_schema, get_tool_count, list_all_tools, manage_servers, optimize_descriptions). The remaining two, 'filesystem' and 'brave-search', are bare nouns with hyphens, breaking the convention and reducing consistency.

    Tool Count4/5

    Seven tools is a reasonable number for a server management and introspection tool. The inclusion of 'filesystem' and 'brave-search' as standalone tools is somewhat unusual but does not significantly bloat the count.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool set covers core operations: listing tools, fetching schemas, counting tools, managing servers (list/add/remove/validate/test/retry), and optimizing descriptions. A notable gap is the lack of an update operation for server configurations, but most common workflows are supported.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues