Skip to main content
Glama
submitator

Submitator MCP Server

Official
by submitator

Related Servers

Alternatives to Submitator MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables MCP-compatible agents to build and operate complete AI front offices for local businesses—branded websites, booking, intake, CRM, and AI agents in one workspace.
      67
      AGPL 3.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI coding agents to create client-editable photo and video galleries, upload and organize media in bulk, generate embed code for popular site builders, and manage client feedback — so non-technical clients can update their own content without a CMS.
      118 npm
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Provides AI agents with unified marketing toolkits for SEO, GEO, paid media, and analytics, enabling audits, analysis, and approved changes across GA4, Search Console, Google Ads, Meta, X, LinkedIn, Reddit, TikTok, WordPress, and GoHighLevel.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Gives coding agents a full agency-style design workflow: capture references with screenshots and measured design tokens, build and compare distinct directions on boards, record decisions, themes and a taste profile, then check results against WCAG 2.2, privacy and mobile performance with launch checks. Enables export of finished designs to HTML, Astro, React, WordPress and Elementor, plus gallery search for licensed designs.
      AGPL 3.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables agents to research competitors, keywords, ads, and AI citations, and to audit public websites for SEO, AEO, and GEO readiness with prioritized fixes.
      MIT

    TDQS

    B3.4/5.0

    Scored across 24 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools target clearly distinct resources and actions across projects, directories, listings, reports, badges, images, share links, and events. A few boundaries are softer, especially get_share_link versus create_share_link and find_directories versus project_directories, but the descriptions generally make the intended use clear.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    The set mostly follows a predictable snake_case verb_noun convention such as create_project, get_report, delete_share_link, and list_listings. Minor deviations include whoami, the noun-only project_directories, and delete_draft naming a draft while acting on a project.

    Tool Count3/5

    With 24 tools, the surface is heavy even for a complex submission workflow. Most tools earn their place, but the lifecycle is split into many granular operations, putting it at the upper edge of reasonable scoping.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool set covers the core domain well: project creation and editing, launch preview and execution, directory discovery, listings, reports, share links, badges, images, and event tracking. Minor gaps exist around managing generated reports or listings after submission, but no major workflow dead end is apparent.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues