Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to ffdecmcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables LLMs to autonomously reverse engineer applications by exposing Ghidra's core functionality through MCP tools. Supports decompiling binaries, analyzing code structure, and automatically renaming methods and data.
      2
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables LLMs to perform JVM bytecode analysis and editing by operating a Recaf workspace through MCP tools. Supports class browsing, decompilation, bytecode manipulation, search, cross-references, and refactoring operations.
      11
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables LLMs to autonomously reverse engineer applications by exposing Ghidra decompilation, renaming, and analysis tools to MCP clients.
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Exposes Ghidra reverse engineering capabilities via MCP, enabling LLMs and agents to analyze binaries, decompile, search, and edit programs headlessly or with GUI integration.
      443
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables LLMs and MCP clients to autonomously reverse engineer applications by exposing core Ghidra functionality, including decompiling and analyzing binaries, renaming methods and data, and listing methods, classes, imports, and exports.
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server for analyzing Android APK, DEX, or JAR files via a headless jadx engine, enabling LLM agents to query decompiled code, symbols, call graphs, and more.
      2
      GPL 3.0

    TDQS

    A4.2/5.0

    Scored across 6 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct aspect of SWF analysis (metadata, symbols, deobfuscation, full decompilation, selective extraction, assets). No functional overlap, so an agent can easily choose the right tool.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Most tools follow verb_noun pattern (e.g., decompile_swf, extract_assets). Only 'deobfuscate' deviates as a single verb, but it is still clear and consistent with the domain.

    Tool Count5/5

    6 tools cover the full SWF analysis workflow from metadata to full decompilation, well-balanced and neither sparse nor bloated.

    Completeness5/5

    The set covers all major SWF analysis needs: metadata, structure listing, deobfuscation, full code decompilation, selective class extraction, and asset extraction. No obvious gaps for standard reverse engineering tasks.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues