Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to MCP WordPress Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A comprehensive MCP server for WordPress automation that enables users to manage content, themes, and site configurations using AI-driven workflows and the WordPress REST API. It provides a wide array of tools for site planning, management, and optimization compatible with tools like Cursor and Claude.
      70 npm
      1
      ISC
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server for WordPress content management via REST API, supporting posts, pages, media, comments, and terms through natural language interfaces like Cursor, ChatGPT, Codex, and Claude.
      13 npm
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A Model Context Protocol (MCP) server that bridges AI assistants to WordPress, enabling natural-language management of posts, pages, media, comments, users, plugins, and settings across multiple sites simultaneously.
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server for WordPress content management that provides a secure interface for AI assistants to interact with WordPress sites, enabling content creation, editing, and media management without destructive operations.
      MIT

    TDQS

    B3/5.0

    Scored across 70 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Each tool targets a distinct resource+action (posts, pages, media, comments, categories, tags, users, settings), so boundaries are mostly clear. Minor overlap exists within clusters like wp_cache_stats vs wp_cache_info and the many SEO/performance analysis tools, but descriptions help differentiate them.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Most tools follow a consistent wp_verb_noun pattern (wp_create_post, wp_list_users, wp_delete_comment). A few deviate to noun-first ordering (wp_performance_stats, wp_cache_stats, wp_cache_clear) and auth tools vary (wp_test_auth, wp_get_auth_status), but the overall convention is predictable.

    Tool Count2/5

    At 70 tools the surface is very heavy, well beyond the 3-15 sweet spot. While WordPress is a broad domain, the large SEO, performance, and cache clusters inflate the count and increase selection burden.

    Completeness4/5

    CRUD coverage is strong and near-complete across the core content types (posts, pages, media, comments, categories, tags, users, settings) plus auth and revisions. Gaps like site/plugin/theme administration and menu management exist but core workflows are well served.