atlassian-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to atlassian-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceEnables to interact with Bitbucket Server repositories, pull requests, and code reviews, including file browsing, PR management, and review actions through natural language.598 npmApache 2.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables interaction with self-hosted Jira instances via Personal Access Token, supporting issue management and project operations through natural language.76 npmApache 2.0
- AlicenseBqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to interact with Bitbucket Cloud and self-hosted instances for pull request reviews, code search, repository operations, and managing PR comments and approvals.19GPL 3.0
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceEnables natural-language interaction with self-hosted Jira through the Jira REST API, supporting PAT or browser-cookie/SSO authentication. It allows viewing and managing issues, projects, comments, assignments, and statuses, as well as JQL search and issue creation/deletion.121 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceConnects AI assistants to Bitbucket Server/Data Center for reviewing pull requests, managing repositories, searching users, and more.149 npm4MIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to interact with Atlassian Cloud (Jira, Confluence, Bitbucket) through natural language, providing CRUD operations for issues, pages, pull requests, and more.868 npmMIT
TDQS
Scored across 10 tools
git_get_context and get_dev_context both claim to be the master entry point for coding/review tasks and return heavily overlapping git+Jira status information, making it unclear which one to call. jira_comment also duplicates the comment capability already bundled inside jira_mutate, further blurring tool boundaries.
Most Jira tools follow a readable jira_<verb_or_noun> pattern and Git tools use git_get_*, but get_dev_context and start_work break the prefix convention, and jira_mutate uses a vague verb instead of a concrete resource-action name. The naming is still mostly predictable despite these deviations.
10 tools is a reasonable size for a combined Jira/Git workflow and covers the major operations without feeling bloated. The count is slightly higher than needed because of overlapping entry-point tools and duplicated comment functionality, but it is still well within an appropriate range.
The set covers core Jira lifecycle operations, attachment retrieval, version management, git context, and diff inspection. Notable gaps include PR creation/merging despite those actions being hinted at in descriptions, and no explicit issue deletion, but most workflows can be completed with the existing tools.