Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to Jules MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      F
      maintenance
      Connects AI coding assistants to the Jules API for autonomous coding sessions. Enables creating and managing coding sessions, GitHub integration, plan approval workflows, and real-time activity tracking directly from your IDE.
      3 npm
      6
      MIT
    • F
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables LLM applications to interact with Google's Jules AI coding assistant to manage repositories, coding sessions, and pull requests. It allows users to programmatically create tasks, approve plans, and communicate with the assistant during active coding sessions.
      9
      -
    • -
      license
      A
      quality
      Not graded
      maintenance
      Enables automation of Google Jules AI coding assistant through task creation, code review automation, repository management, and AI-powered development workflows. Supports multiple session modes including cloud deployment with persistent authentication.
      13
      -
    • F
      license
      B
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables Codex to interact with Google Jules through MCP, allowing discovery of connected GitHub repositories, starting coding sessions, monitoring activity, sending follow-up instructions, approving plans, and retrieving results and pull-request links.
      8
      -

    TDQS

    B3/5.0

    Scored across 26 tools

    Disambiguation3/5

    There is significant overlap among tools, causing potential confusion. For example, 'jules_create_session' and 'create_session' appear to serve the same purpose, and 'jules_get_session' and 'get_session_state' are similarly redundant. However, descriptions help clarify some distinctions, such as between 'get_code_review_context' and 'show_code_diff'.

    Naming Consistency2/5

    Naming conventions are inconsistent, mixing patterns like 'jules_verb_noun' (e.g., 'jules_create_session'), 'verb_noun' (e.g., 'create_session'), and other styles (e.g., 'query_cache'). This lack of a uniform pattern makes the tool set harder to navigate and predict.

    Tool Count2/5

    With 26 tools, the count is excessive for the server's purpose of managing Jules sessions. Many tools are redundant or overly specific, such as multiple variants for creating sessions or waiting for states, which could be consolidated into fewer, more versatile tools.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool set covers the core lifecycle of Jules sessions well, including creation, monitoring, interaction, and review. Minor gaps exist, such as no direct tool for deleting sessions or managing user accounts, but agents can likely work around these with the provided tools.