media-gen-mcp
Click on "Install Server".
Wait a few minutes for the server to deploy. Once ready, it will show a "Started" state.
In the chat, type
@followed by the MCP server name and your instructions, e.g., "@media-gen-mcpGenerate an image of a futuristic city"
That's it! The server will respond to your query, and you can continue using it as needed.
Here is a step-by-step guide with screenshots.
media-gen-mcp
Media Gen MCP is a strict TypeScript Model Context Protocol (MCP) server for OpenAI Images (gpt-image-1.5, gpt-image-1), OpenAI Videos (Sora), and Google GenAI Videos (Veo): generate/edit images, create/remix video jobs, and fetch media from URLs or disk with smart resource_link vs inline image outputs and optional sharp processing. Production-focused (full strict typecheck, ESLint + Vitest CI). Works with fast-agent, Claude Desktop, ChatGPT, Cursor, VS Code, Windsurf, and any MCP-compatible client.
Design principle: spec-first, type-safe image tooling – strict OpenAI Images API + MCP compliance with fully static TypeScript types and flexible result placements/response formats for different clients.
Generate images from text prompts using OpenAI's
gpt-image-1.5model (withgpt-image-1compatibility and DALL·E support planned in future versions).Edit images (inpainting, outpainting, compositing) from 1 up to 16 images at once, with advanced prompt control.
Generate videos via OpenAI Videos (
sora-2,sora-2-pro) with job create/remix/list/retrieve/delete and asset downloads.Generate videos via Google GenAI (Veo) with operation polling and file-first downloads.
Fetch & compress images from HTTP(S) URLs or local file paths with smart size/quality optimization.
Fetch documents from HTTP(S) URLs or local file paths and return
resource_link/resourceoutputs.Debug MCP output shapes with a
test-imagestool that mirrors production result placement (content,structuredContent,toplevel).Integrates with: fast-agent, Windsurf, Claude Desktop, Cursor, VS Code, and any MCP-compatible client.
✨ Features
Strict MCP spec support
Tool outputs are first-classCallToolResultobjects from the latest MCP schema, including:contentitems (text,image,resource_link,resource), optionalstructuredContent, optional top-levelfiles, and theisErrorflag for failures.Full gpt-image-1.5 and sora-2/sora-2-pro parameters coverage (generate & edit)
openai-images-generatemirrors the OpenAI ImagescreateAPI forgpt-image-1.5(andgpt-image-1) (background, moderation, size, quality, output_format, output_compression,n,user, etc.).openai-images-editmirrors the OpenAI ImagescreateEditAPI forgpt-image-1.5(andgpt-image-1) (image, mask,n, quality, size,user).
OpenAI Videos (Sora) job tooling (create / remix / list / retrieve / delete / content)
openai-videos-createmirrorsvideos/createand can optionally wait for completion.openai-videos-remixmirrorsvideos/remix.openai-videos-listmirrorsvideos/list.openai-videos-retrievemirrorsvideos/retrieve.openai-videos-deletemirrorsvideos/delete.openai-videos-retrieve-contentmirrorsvideos/contentand downloadsvideo/thumbnail/spritesheetassets to disk, returning MCPresource_link(default) or embeddedresourceblocks (viatool_result).
Google GenAI (Veo) operations + downloads (generate / retrieve operation / retrieve content)
google-videos-generatestarts a long-running operation (ai.models.generateVideos) and can optionally wait for completion and download.mp4outputs. Veo model referencegoogle-videos-retrieve-operationpolls an existing operation.google-videos-retrieve-contentdownloads an.mp4from a completed operation, returning MCPresource_link(default) or embeddedresourceblocks (viatool_result).
Fetch and process images from URLs or files
fetch-imagestool loads images from HTTP(S) URLs or local file paths with optional, user-controlled compression (disabled by default). Supports parallel processing of up to 20 images.Fetch videos from URLs or files
fetch-videostool lists local videos or downloads remote video URLs to disk and returns MCPresource_link(default) or embeddedresourceblocks (viatool_result).Fetch documents from URLs or files
fetch-documenttool downloads remote files or reuses local paths and returns MCPresource_link(default) or embeddedresourceblocks (viatool_result).Mix and edit up to 16 images
openai-images-editacceptsimageas a single string or an array of 1–16 file paths/base64 strings, matching the OpenAI spec for GPT Image models (gpt-image-1.5,gpt-image-1) image edits.Smart image compression
Built-in compression using sharp — iteratively reduces quality and dimensions to fit MCP payload limits while maintaining visual quality.Resource-aware file output with
resource_linkAutomatic switch from inline base64 to
filewhen the total response size exceeds a safe threshold.Outputs are written to disk using
output_<time_t>_media-gen__<tool>_<id>.<ext>filenames (images/documents use a generated UUID; videos use the OpenAIvideo_id) and exposed to MCP clients viacontent[]depending ontool_result(resource_link/imagefor images,resource_link/resourcefor video/document downloads).
Built-in test-images tool for MCP client debugging
test-imagesreads sample images from a configured directory and returns them using the same result-building logic as production tools. Usetool_resultandresponse_formatparameters to test how different MCP clients handlecontent[]andstructuredContent.Structured MCP error handling
All tool errors (validation, OpenAI API failures, I/O) are returned as MCP errors withisError: trueandcontent: [{ type: "text", text: <error message> }], making failures easy to parse and surface in MCP clients.
Related MCP server: imagegen-mcp
🚀 Installation
git clone https://github.com/strato-space/media-gen-mcp.git
cd media-gen-mcp
npm install
npm run buildBuild modes:
npm run build– strict TypeScript build with all strict flags enabled, includingskipLibCheck: false. Incremental builds via.tsbuildinfo(~2-3s on warm cache).npm run esbuild– fast bundling via esbuild (no type checking, useful for rapid iteration).
Development mode (no build required)
For development or when TypeScript compilation fails due to memory constraints:
npm run dev # Uses tsx to run TypeScript directlyQuality checks
npm run lint # ESLint with typescript-eslint
npm run typecheck # Strict tsc --noEmit
npm run test # Unit tests (vitest)
npm run test:watch # Watch mode for TDD
npm run ci # lint + typecheck + testUnit tests
The project uses vitest for unit testing. Tests are located in test/.
Covered modules:
Module | Tests | Description |
| 12 | Image format detection, buffer processing, file I/O |
| 31 | URL/path validation, output resolution, result placement, resource links |
| 19 | Configuration parsing, env validation, defaults |
| 10 | Structured logging + truncation safety |
| 5 | Sora pricing estimate helpers |
| 69 | Zod schema validation for all tools, type inference |
| 3 | End-to-end MCP tool call behavior |
| 3 | End-to-end MCP tool call behavior |
Test categories:
compression —
isCompressionAvailable,detectImageFormat,processBufferWithCompression,readAndProcessImagehelpers —
isHttpUrl,isAbsolutePath,isBase64Image,ensureDirectoryWritable,resolveOutputPath,getResultPlacement,buildResourceLinksenv — config loading and validation for
MEDIA_GEN_*/MEDIA_GEN_MCP_*settingslogger — truncation and error formatting behavior
schemas — validation for
openai-images-*,openai-videos-*,fetch-images,fetch-videos,test-imagesinputs, boundary testing (prompt length, image count limits, path validation)
npm run test
# ✓ test/compression.test.ts (12 tests)
# ✓ test/helpers.test.ts (31 tests)
# ✓ test/env.test.ts (19 tests)
# ✓ test/logger.test.ts (10 tests)
# ✓ test/pricing.test.ts (5 tests)
# ✓ test/schemas.test.ts (69 tests)
# ✓ test/fetch-images.integration.test.ts (3 tests)
# ✓ test/fetch-videos.integration.test.ts (3 tests)
# Tests: 152 passedRun directly via npx (no local clone)
You can also run the server straight from a remote repo using npx:
npx -y github:strato-space/media-gen-mcp --env-file /path/to/media-gen.envThe --env-file argument tells the server which env file to load (e.g. when you keep secrets outside the cloned directory). The file should contain OPENAI_API_KEY, optional Azure variables, and any MEDIA_GEN_MCP_* settings.
secrets.yaml (optional)
You can keep API keys (and optional Google Vertex AI settings) in a secrets.yaml file (compatible with the fast-agent secrets template):
openai:
api_key: <your-api-key-here>
anthropic:
api_key: <your-api-key-here>
google:
api_key: <your-api-key-here>
vertex_ai:
enabled: true
project_id: your-gcp-project-id
location: europe-west4media-gen-mcp loads secrets.yaml from the current working directory (or from --secrets-file /path/to/secrets.yaml) and applies it to env vars; values in secrets.yaml override env, and <your-api-key-here> placeholders are ignored.
⚡ Quick start (fast-agent & Windsurf)
fast-agent
In fast-agent, MCP servers are configured in fastagent.config.yaml under the mcp.servers section (see the fast-agent docs).
To add media-gen-mcp from GitHub via npx as an MCP server:
# fastagent.config.yaml
mcp:
servers:
# your existing servers (e.g. fetch, filesystem, huggingface, ...)
media-gen-mcp:
command: "npx"
args: ["-y", "github:strato-space/media-gen-mcp", "--env-file", "/path/to/media-gen.env"]Put OPENAI_API_KEY and other settings into media-gen.env (see .env.sample in this repo).
Windsurf
Add an MCP server that runs media-gen-mcp from GitHub via npx using the JSON format below (similar to Claude Desktop / VS Code):
{
"mcpServers": {
"media-gen-mcp": {
"command": "npx",
"args": ["-y", "github:strato-space/media-gen-mcp", "--env-file", "/path/to/media-gen.env"]
}
}
}🔑 Configuration
Add to your MCP client config (fast-agent, Windsurf, Claude Desktop, Cursor, VS Code):
{
"mcpServers": {
"media-gen-mcp": {
"command": "npx",
"args": ["-y", "github:strato-space/media-gen-mcp"],
"env": { "OPENAI_API_KEY": "sk-..." }
}
}
}Also supports Azure deployments:
{
"mcpServers": {
"media-gen-mcp": {
"command": "npx",
"args": ["-y", "github:strato-space/media-gen-mcp"],
"env": {
// "AZURE_OPENAI_API_KEY": "sk-...",
// "AZURE_OPENAI_ENDPOINT": "my.endpoint.com",
"OPENAI_API_VERSION": "2024-12-01-preview"
}
}
}
}Environment variables:
Set
OPENAI_API_KEY(and optionallyAZURE_OPENAI_API_KEY,AZURE_OPENAI_ENDPOINT,OPENAI_API_VERSION) in the environment of the process that runsnode dist/index.js(shell, systemd unit, Docker env, etc.).The server will optionally load a local
.envfile from its working directory if present (it does not override already-set environment variables).You can also pass
--env-file /path/to/envwhen starting the server (including vianpx); this file is loaded viadotenvbefore tools run, again without overriding already-set variables.
Logging and base64 truncation
To avoid flooding logs with huge image payloads, the built-in logger applies a
log-only sanitizer to structured data passed to log.debug/info/warn/error:
Truncates configured string fields (e.g.
b64_json,base64, stringdata,image_url) to a short preview controlled byLOG_TRUNCATE_DATA_MAX(default: 64 characters). The list of keys defaults toLOG_SANITIZE_KEYSinsidesrc/lib/logger.tsand can be overridden viaMEDIA_GEN_MCP_LOG_SANITIZE_KEYS(comma-separated list of field names).Sanitization is applied only to log serialization; tool results returned to MCP clients are never modified.
Control via environment:
MEDIA_GEN_MCP_LOG_SANITIZE_IMAGES(default:true)1,true,yes,on– enable truncation (default behaviour).0,false,no,off– disable truncation and log full payloads.
Field list and limits are configured in src/lib/logger.ts via
LOG_SANITIZE_KEYS and LOG_TRUNCATE_DATA_MAX.
Security and local file access
Allowed directories: All tools are restricted to paths matching
MEDIA_GEN_DIRS. If unset, defaults to/tmp/media-gen-mcp(or%TEMP%/media-gen-mcpon Windows).Test samples:
MEDIA_GEN_MCP_TEST_SAMPLE_DIRadds a directory to the allowlist and enables thetest-imagestool.Local reads:
fetch-imagesandfetch-documentaccept file paths (absolute or relative). Relative paths are resolved against the firstMEDIA_GEN_DIRSentry and must still match an allowed pattern.Remote reads: HTTP(S) fetches are filtered by
MEDIA_GEN_URLSpatterns. Empty = allow all.Writes:
openai-images-generate,openai-images-edit,fetch-images,fetch-videos, andfetch-documentwrite under the first entry ofMEDIA_GEN_DIRS.test-imagesis read-only and does not create new files.
Glob patterns
Both MEDIA_GEN_DIRS and MEDIA_GEN_URLS support glob wildcards:
Pattern | Matches | Example |
| Any single segment (no |
|
| Any number of segments |
|
URL examples:
MEDIA_GEN_URLS=https://*.cdn.example.com/,https://storage.example.com/**/assets/Path examples:
MEDIA_GEN_DIRS=/home/*/media-gen/output/,/data/**/images/⚠️ Warning: Trailing wildcards without a delimiter (e.g., /home/user/* or https://cdn.com/**) expose entire subtrees and trigger a console warning at startup.
Recommended mitigations
Run under a dedicated OS user with access only to allowed directories.
Keep allowlists minimal. Avoid
*in home directories or system paths.Use explicit
MEDIA_GEN_URLSprefixes for remote fetches.Monitor allowed directories via OS ACLs or backups.
Tool Result Parameters: tool_result and response_format
Image tools (openai-images-*, fetch-images, test-images) support two parameters that control the shape of the MCP tool result:
Parameter | Values | Default | Description |
|
|
| Controls |
|
|
| Controls |
Video/document download tools (openai-videos-create / openai-videos-remix when downloading, openai-videos-retrieve-content, google-videos-generate when downloading, google-videos-retrieve-content, fetch-videos, fetch-document) support:
Parameter | Values | Default | Description |
|
|
| Controls |
Google video tools (google-videos-*) also support:
Parameter | Values | Default | Description |
|
|
| Controls |
tool_result — controls content[]
Images (
openai-images-*,fetch-images,test-images)resource_link(default): EmitsResourceLinkitems withfile://orhttps://URIsimage: Emits base64ImageContentblocks
Videos (tools that download video data)
resource_link(default): EmitsResourceLinkitems withfile://orhttps://URIsresource: EmitsEmbeddedResourceblocks with base64resource.blob
Documents (
fetch-document)resource_link(default): EmitsResourceLinkitems withfile://orhttps://URIsresource: EmitsEmbeddedResourceblocks with base64resource.blob
response_format — controls structuredContent
For OpenAI images, structuredContent always contains an OpenAI ImagesResponse-style object:
{
"created": 1234567890,
"data": [
{ "url": "https://..." } // or { "path": "/abs/path.png" } / { "b64_json": "..." } depending on response_format
]
}url(default):data[].urlcontains file URLspath:data[].pathcontains local filesystem pathsb64_json:data[].b64_jsoncontains base64-encoded image data
For Google videos, response_format controls whether structuredContent.response.generatedVideos[].video prefers:
url(default):video.uri(and stripsvideo.videoBytes)b64_json:video.videoBytes(and stripsvideo.uri)
Backward Compatibility (MCP 5.2.6)
Per MCP spec 5.2.6, a TextContent block with serialized JSON (always using URLs in data[]) is also included in content[] for backward compatibility with clients that don't support structuredContent.
Example tool result structure:
{
"content": [
// ResourceLink or ImageContent based on tool_result
{ "type": "resource_link", "uri": "https://...", "name": "image.png", "mimeType": "image/png" },
// Serialized JSON for backward compatibility (MCP 5.2.6)
{ "type": "text", "text": "{ \"created\": 1234567890, \"data\": [{ \"url\": \"https://...\" }] }" }
],
"structuredContent": {
"created": 1234567890,
"data": [{ "url": "https://..." }]
}
}ChatGPT MCP client behavior (chatgpt.com, as of 2025-12-01):
ChatGPT currently ignores
content[]image data in favor ofstructuredContent.For ChatGPT, use
response_format: "url"and configure the firstMEDIA_GEN_MCP_URL_PREFIXESentry as a public HTTPS prefix (for exampleMEDIA_GEN_MCP_URL_PREFIXES=https://media-gen.example.com/media).
For Anthropic clients (Claude Desktop, etc.), the default configuration works well.
Network access via mcp-proxy (SSE)
For networked SSE access you can front media-gen-mcp with mcp-proxy or its equivalent. This setup has been tested with the TypeScript SSE proxy implementation punkpeye/mcp-proxy.
For example, a one-line command looks like:
mcp-proxy --host=0.0.0.0 --port=99 --server=sse --sseEndpoint=/ --shell 'npx -y github:strato-space/media-gen-mcp --env-file /path/to/media-gen.env'In production you would typically wire this up via a systemd template unit that loads PORT/SHELL_CMD from an EnvironmentFile= (see server/mcp/mcp@.service style setups).
🛠 Tool signatures
openai-images-generate
Arguments (input schema):
prompt(string, required)Text prompt describing the desired image.
Max length: 32,000 characters.
background("transparent" | "opaque" | "auto", optional)Background handling mode.
If
backgroundis"transparent", thenoutput_formatmust be"png"or"webp".
model("gpt-image-1.5" | "gpt-image-1", optional, default: "gpt-image-1.5")moderation("auto" | "low", optional)Content moderation behavior, passed through to the Images API.
n(integer, optional)Number of images to generate.
Min: 1, Max: 10.
output_compression(integer, optional)Compression level (0–100).
Only applied when
output_formatis"jpeg"or"webp".
output_format("png" | "jpeg" | "webp", optional)Output image format.
If omitted, the server treats output as PNG semantics.
quality("auto" | "high" | "medium" | "low", default: "high")size("1024x1024" | "1536x1024" | "1024x1536" | "auto", default: "1024x1536")user(string, optional)User identifier forwarded to OpenAI for monitoring.
response_format("url" | "path" | "b64_json", default: "url")Response format (aligned with OpenAI Images API):
"url": file/URL-based output (resource_link items,image_urlfields,data[].urlinapiplacement)."path": local filesystem paths indata[].path(for local skill workflows)."b64_json": inline base64 image data (image content,data[].b64_jsoninapiplacement).
tool_result("resource_link" | "image", default: "resource_link")Controls
content[]shape:"resource_link"emits ResourceLink items (file/URL-based)"image"emits base64 ImageContent blocks
Behavior notes:
The server uses OpenAI
gpt-image-1.5by default (setmodel: "gpt-image-1"for legacy behavior).If the total size of all base64 images would exceed the configured payload threshold (default ~50MB via
MCP_MAX_CONTENT_BYTES), the server automatically switches the effective output mode to file/URL-based and saves images to the first entry ofMEDIA_GEN_DIRS(default:/tmp/media-gen-mcp).Even when you explicitly request
response_format: "b64_json", the server still writes the files to disk (for static hosting, caching, or later reuse). Exposure of file paths / URLs in the tool result then depends onMEDIA_GEN_MCP_RESULT_PLACEMENTand per-callresult_placement(see section below).
Output (MCP CallToolResult, when placement includes "content"):
When the effective
outputmode is"base64":contentis an array that may contain:image items:
{ type: "image", data: <base64 string>, mimeType: <"image/png" | "image/jpeg" | "image/webp"> }
optional text items with revised prompts returned by the Images API (for models that support it, e.g. DALL·E 3):
{ type: "text", text: <revised_prompt string> }
When the effective
outputmode is"file":contentcontains oneresource_linkitem per file, plus the same optionaltextitems with revised prompts:{ type: "resource_link", uri: "file:///absolute-path-1.png", name: "absolute-path-1.png", mimeType: <image mime> }
For
gpt-image-1.5andgpt-image-1, an additionaltextline is included with a pricing estimate (based onstructuredContent.usage), andstructuredContent.pricingcontains the full pricing breakdown.
When result_placement includes "api", openai-images-generate instead returns an OpenAI Images API-like object without MCP wrappers:
{
"created": 1764599500,
"data": [
{ "b64_json": "..." } // or { "url": "https://.../media/file.png" } when output: "file"
],
"background": "opaque",
"output_format": "png",
"size": "1024x1024",
"quality": "high"
}openai-images-edit
Arguments (input schema):
image(string or string[], required)Either a single absolute path to an image file (
.png,.jpg,.jpeg,.webp), a base64-encoded image string (optionally as adata:image/...;base64,...URL), or an HTTP(S) URL pointing to a publicly accessible image, or an array of 1–16 such strings (for multi-image editing).When an HTTP(S) URL is provided, the server fetches the image and converts it to base64 before sending to OpenAI.
prompt(string, required)Text description of the desired edit.
Max length: 32,000 characters.
mask(string, optional)Absolute path, base64 string, or HTTP(S) URL for a mask image (PNG < 4MB, same dimensions as the source image). Transparent areas mark regions to edit.
model("gpt-image-1.5" | "gpt-image-1", optional, default: "gpt-image-1.5")n(integer, optional)Number of images to generate.
Min: 1, Max: 10.
quality("auto" | "high" | "medium" | "low", default: "high")size("1024x1024" | "1536x1024" | "1024x1536" | "auto", default: "1024x1536")user(string, optional)User identifier forwarded to OpenAI for monitoring.
response_format("url" | "path" | "b64_json", default: "url")Response format (aligned with OpenAI Images API):
"url": file/URL-based output (resource_link items,image_urlfields,data[].urlinapiplacement)."path": local filesystem paths indata[].path(for local skill workflows)."b64_json": inline base64 image data (image content,data[].b64_jsoninapiplacement).
tool_result("resource_link" | "image", default: "resource_link")Controls
content[]shape:"resource_link"emits ResourceLink items (file/URL-based)"image"emits base64 ImageContent blocks
Behavior notes:
The server accepts
imageandmaskas absolute paths, base64/data URLs, or HTTP(S) URLs.When an HTTP(S) URL is provided, the server fetches the image and converts it to a base64 data URL before calling OpenAI.
For edits, the server always returns PNG semantics (mime type
image/png) when emitting images.
Output (MCP CallToolResult):
When the effective
outputmode is"base64":contentis an array that may contain:image items:
{ type: "image", data: <base64 string>, mimeType: "image/png" }
optional text items with revised prompts (when the underlying model returns them):
{ type: "text", text: <revised_prompt string> }
When the effective
outputmode is"file":contentcontains oneresource_linkitem per file, plus the same optionaltextitems with revised prompts:{ type: "resource_link", uri: "file:///absolute-path-1.png", name: "absolute-path-1.png", mimeType: "image/png" }
For
gpt-image-1.5andgpt-image-1, an additionaltextline is included with a pricing estimate (based onstructuredContent.usage), andstructuredContent.pricingcontains the full pricing breakdown.
When result_placement includes "api", openai-images-edit follows the same raw API format as openai-images-generate (top-level created, data[], background, output_format, size, quality with b64_json for base64 output or url for file output).
Error handling (both tools):
On errors inside the tool handler (validation, OpenAI API failures, I/O, etc.), the server returns a CallToolResult marked as an error:
isError: truecontent: [{ type: "text", text: <error message string> }]
The error message text is taken directly from the underlying exception message, without additional commentary from the server, while full details are logged to the server console.
openai-videos-create
Create a video generation job using the OpenAI Videos API (videos.create).
Arguments (input schema):
prompt(string, required) — text prompt describing the video (max 32K chars).input_reference(string, optional) — optional image reference (HTTP(S) URL, base64/data URL, or file path).input_reference_fit("match" | "cover" | "contain" | "stretch", default: "contain")How to fit
input_referenceto the requested videosize:match: require exact dimensions (fails fast on mismatch)cover: resize + center-crop to fillcontain: resize + pad/letterbox to fit (default)stretch: resize with distortion
input_reference_background("blur" | "black" | "white" | "#RRGGBB" | "#RRGGBBAA", default: "blur")Padding background used when
input_reference_fit="contain".
model("sora-2" | "sora-2-pro", default: "sora-2-pro")seconds("4" | "8" | "12", optional)size("720x1280" | "1280x720" | "1024x1792" | "1792x1024", optional)1024x1792and1792x1024requiresora-2-pro.If
input_referenceis omitted andsizeis omitted, the API default is used.
wait_for_completion(boolean, default: true)When true, the server polls
openai-videos-retrieveuntilcompletedorfailed(or timeout), then downloads assets.
timeout_ms(integer, default: 900000)poll_interval_ms(integer, default: 2000)download_variants(string[], default: ["video"])Allowed values:
"video" | "thumbnail" | "spritesheet".
tool_result("resource_link"|"resource", default:"resource_link")Controls
content[]shape for downloaded assets:"resource_link"emits ResourceLink items (file/URL-based)"resource"emits EmbeddedResource blocks with base64resource.blob
Output (MCP CallToolResult):
structuredContent: OpenAIVideoobject (job metadata; final state whenwait_for_completion=true).content: includesresource_link(default) or embeddedresourceblocks for downloaded assets (when requested) and text blocks with JSON.Includes a summary JSON block:
{ "video_id": "...", "pricing": { "currency": "USD", "model": "...", "size": "...", "seconds": 4, "price": 0.1, "cost": 0.4 } | null }(and when waiting:{ "video_id": "...", "assets": [...], "pricing": ... }).
openai-videos-remix
Create a remix job from an existing video_id (videos.remix).
Arguments (input schema):
video_id(string, required)prompt(string, required)wait_for_completion,timeout_ms,poll_interval_ms,download_variants,tool_result— same semantics asopenai-videos-create(default wait is true).
openai-videos-list
List video jobs (videos.list).
Arguments (input schema):
after(string, optional) — cursor (video id) to list after.limit(integer, optional)order("asc" | "desc", optional)
Output:
structuredContent: OpenAI list response shape{ data, has_more, last_id }.content: a text block with serialized JSON.
openai-videos-retrieve
Retrieve job status (videos.retrieve).
video_id(string, required)
openai-videos-delete
Delete a video job (videos.delete).
video_id(string, required)
openai-videos-retrieve-content
Retrieve an asset for a completed job (videos.downloadContent, REST GET /videos/{video_id}/content), write it under allowed MEDIA_GEN_DIRS, and return MCP resource_link (default) or embedded resource blocks (via tool_result).
Arguments (input schema):
video_id(string, required)variant("video" | "thumbnail" | "spritesheet", default: "video")tool_result("resource_link"|"resource", default:"resource_link")
Output (MCP CallToolResult):
structuredContent: OpenAIVideoobject.content: aresource_link(or embeddedresource), a summary JSON block{ video_id, variant, uri, pricing }, plus the full video JSON.
google-videos-generate
Create a Google video generation operation using the Google GenAI SDK (@google/genai) ai.models.generateVideos.
Arguments (input schema):
prompt(string, optional)input_reference(string, optional) — image-to-video input (HTTP(S) URL, base64/data URL, or file path underMEDIA_GEN_DIRS)input_reference_mime_type(string, optional) — override forinput_referenceMIME type (must beimage/*)input_video_reference(string, optional) — video-extension input (HTTP(S) URL or file path underMEDIA_GEN_DIRS; mutually exclusive withinput_reference)model(string, default:"veo-3.1-generate-001")number_of_videos(integer, default:1)aspect_ratio("16:9" | "9:16", optional)duration_seconds(integer, optional)Veo 2 models: 5–8 seconds (default: 8)
Veo 3 models: 4, 6, or 8 seconds (default: 8)
When using
referenceImages: 8 seconds
person_generation("DONT_ALLOW" | "ALLOW_ADULT" | "ALLOW_ALL", optional)wait_for_completion(boolean, default:true)timeout_ms(integer, default:900000)poll_interval_ms(integer, default:10000)download_when_done(boolean, optional; defaults totruewhen waiting)tool_result("resource_link"|"resource", default:"resource_link")Controls
content[]shape when downloading generated videos.
response_format("url"|"b64_json", default:"url")Controls
structuredContent.response.generatedVideos[].videofields:"url"prefersvideo.uri(and stripsvideo.videoBytes)"b64_json"prefersvideo.videoBytes(and stripsvideo.uri)
Requirements:
Gemini Developer API: set
GEMINI_API_KEY(orGOOGLE_API_KEY), orgoogle.api_keyinsecrets.yaml.Vertex AI: set
GOOGLE_GENAI_USE_VERTEXAI=true,GOOGLE_CLOUD_PROJECT, andGOOGLE_CLOUD_LOCATION(orgoogle.vertex_ai.*insecrets.yaml).
Output:
structuredContent: Google operation object (includesname,done, andresponse.generatedVideos[]when available).content: status text, optional.mp4resource_link(default) or embeddedresourceblocks (when downloaded), plus JSON text blocks for compatibility.
google-videos-retrieve-operation
Retrieve/poll an existing Google video operation (ai.operations.getVideosOperation).
operation_name(string, required)response_format("url"|"b64_json", default:"url")
Output:
structuredContent: Google operation object.content: JSON text blocks with a short summary + the full operation.
google-videos-retrieve-content
Download .mp4 content for a completed operation and return file-first MCP resource_link (default) or embedded resource blocks (via tool_result).
operation_name(string, required)index(integer, default:0) — selectsresponse.generatedVideos[index]tool_result("resource_link"|"resource", default:"resource_link")response_format("url"|"b64_json", default:"url")
Recommended workflow:
Call
google-videos-generatewithwait_for_completion=true(default) to get the completed operation and downloads; set to false only if you need the operation id immediately.Poll
google-videos-retrieve-operationuntildone=true.Call
google-videos-retrieve-contentto download an.mp4and receive aresource_link(or embeddedresource).
fetch-images
Fetch and process images from URLs or local file paths with optional compression.
Arguments (input schema):
sources(string[], optional)Array of image sources: HTTP(S) URLs or file paths (absolute or relative to the first
MEDIA_GEN_DIRSentry).Min: 1, Max: 20 images.
Mutually exclusive with
idsandn.
ids(string[], optional)Array of image IDs to fetch by local filename match under the primary
MEDIA_GEN_DIRS[0]directory.IDs must be safe (
[A-Za-z0-9_-]only; no..,*,?, slashes).Matches filenames containing
_{id}_or_{id}.(supports both single outputs and multi-output suffixes like_1.png).When
idsis used,compressionandfileare not supported (no new files are created).Mutually exclusive with
sourcesandn.
n(integer, optional)When set, returns the last N image files from the primary
MEDIA_GEN_DIRS[0]directory.Files are sorted by modification time (most recently modified first).
Mutually exclusive with
sourcesandids.
compression(object, optional)max_size(integer, optional): Max dimension in pixels. Images larger than this will be resized.max_bytes(integer, optional): Target max file size in bytes. Default: 819200 (800KB).quality(integer, optional): JPEG/WebP quality 1-100. Default: 85.format("jpeg" | "png" | "webp", optional): Output format. Default: jpeg.
response_format("url" | "path" | "b64_json", default: "url")Response format: file/URL-based (
url), local path (path), or inline base64 (b64_json).
tool_result("resource_link" | "image", default: "resource_link")Controls
content[]shape:"resource_link"emits ResourceLink items (file/URL-based)"image"emits base64 ImageContent blocks
file(string, optional)Base path for output files. If multiple images, index suffix is added.
Behavior notes:
Images are processed in parallel for maximum throughput.
Compression is only applied when
compressionoptions are provided.Compression uses sharp with iterative quality/size reduction when enabled.
Partial success: if some sources fail, successful images are still returned with errors listed in the response.
When
nis provided, it is only honored when theMEDIA_GEN_MCP_ALLOW_FETCH_LAST_N_IMAGESenvironment variable is set totrue. Otherwise, the call fails with a validation error.Sometimes an MCP client (for example, ChargeGPT) may not wait for a response from
media-gen-mcpdue to a timeout. In creative environments where you need to quickly retrieve the latestopenai-images-generate/openai-images-editoutputs, you can usefetch-imageswith thenargument. When theMEDIA_GEN_MCP_ALLOW_FETCH_LAST_N_IMAGES=trueenvironment variable is set,fetch-imageswill return the last N files fromMEDIA_GEN_DIRS[0]even if the original generation or edit operation timed out on the MCP client side.
fetch-videos
Fetch videos from HTTP(S) URLs or local file paths.
Arguments (input schema):
sources(string[], optional)Array of video sources: HTTP(S) URLs or file paths (absolute or relative to the first
MEDIA_GEN_DIRSentry).Min: 1, Max: 20 videos.
Mutually exclusive with
idsandn.
ids(string[], optional)Array of video IDs to fetch by local filename match under the primary
MEDIA_GEN_DIRS[0]directory.IDs must be safe (
[A-Za-z0-9_-]only; no..,*,?, slashes).Matches filenames containing
_{id}_or_{id}.(supports both single outputs and multi-asset suffixes like_thumbnail.webp).When
idsis used,fileis not supported (no downloads; returns existing files).Mutually exclusive with
sourcesandn.
n(integer, optional)When set, returns the last N video files from the primary
MEDIA_GEN_DIRS[0]directory.Files are sorted by modification time (most recently modified first).
Mutually exclusive with
sourcesandids.
tool_result("resource_link"|"resource", default:"resource_link")Controls
content[]shape:"resource_link"emits ResourceLink items (file/URL-based)"resource"emits EmbeddedResource blocks with base64resource.blob
file(string, optional)Base path for output files (used when downloading from URLs). If multiple videos are downloaded, an index suffix is added.
Output:
content: oneresource_link(default) or embeddedresourceblock per resolved video, plus an optional error summary text block.structuredContent:{ data: [{ source, uri, file, mimeType, name, downloaded }], errors?: string[] }.
Behavior notes:
URL downloads are only allowed when the URL matches
MEDIA_GEN_URLS(when set).When
nis provided, it is only honored when theMEDIA_GEN_MCP_ALLOW_FETCH_LAST_N_VIDEOSenvironment variable is set totrue. Otherwise, the call fails with a validation error.
fetch-document
Fetch documents from HTTP(S) URLs or local file paths.
Arguments (input schema):
sources(string[])Array of document sources: HTTP(S) URLs or file paths (absolute or relative to the first
MEDIA_GEN_DIRSentry).Min: 1, Max: 20 documents.
tool_result("resource_link"|"resource", default:"resource_link")Controls
content[]shape:"resource_link"emits ResourceLink items (file/URL-based)"resource"emits EmbeddedResource blocks with base64resource.blob
file(string, optional)Base path for output files (used when downloading from URLs). If multiple documents are downloaded, an index suffix is added.
Output:
content: oneresource_link(default) or embeddedresourceblock per resolved document, plus an optional error summary text block.structuredContent:{ data: [{ source, uri, file, mimeType, name, downloaded }], errors?: string[] }.
Behavior notes:
URL downloads are only allowed when the URL matches
MEDIA_GEN_URLS(when set).Local paths are validated against
MEDIA_GEN_DIRSand can be provided asfile://URLs.Default filenames use
output_<time_t>_media-gen__fetch-document_<uuid>.<ext>whenfileis omitted.
test-images
Debug tool for testing MCP result placement without calling OpenAI API.
Enabled only when MEDIA_GEN_MCP_TEST_SAMPLE_DIR is set. The tool reads existing images from this directory and does not create new files.
Arguments (input schema):
response_format("url" | "path" | "b64_json", default: "url")result_placement("content" | "api" | "structured" | "toplevel" or array of these, optional)Override
MEDIA_GEN_MCP_RESULT_PLACEMENTfor this call.
compression(object, optional)Same logical tuning knobs as
fetch-images, but using camelCase keys:
tool_result("resource_link" | "image", default: "resource_link")Controls
content[]shape:"resource_link"emits ResourceLink items (file/URL-based)"image"emits base64 ImageContent blocksmaxSize(integer, optional): max dimension in pixels.maxBytes(integer, optional): target max file size in bytes.quality(integer, optional): JPEG/WebP quality 1–100.format("jpeg" | "png" | "webp", optional): output format.
Behavior notes:
Reads up to 10 images from the sample directory (no sorting — filesystem order).
Uses the same result-building logic as
openai-images-generateandopenai-images-edit(includingresult_placementoverrides).When
output == "base64"andcompressionis provided, sample files are read and compressed in memory usingsharp; original files on disk are never modified.Useful for testing how different MCP clients handle various result structures.
When
result_placementincludes"api", the tool returns a mock OpenAI Images API-style object:Top level:
created,data[],background,output_format,size,quality.For
response_format: "b64_json"eachdata[i]containsb64_json.For
response_format: "path"eachdata[i]containspath.For
response_format: "url"eachdata[i]containsurlinstead ofb64_json.
Debug CLI helpers for test-images
For local debugging there are two helper scripts that call test-images directly:
npm run test-images– usesdebug/debug-call.tsand prints the validatedCallToolResultas seen by the MCP SDK client. Usage:npm run test-images -- [placement] [--response_format url|path|b64_json] # examples: # npm run test-images -- structured --response_format b64_json # npm run test-images -- structured --response_format path # npm run test-images -- structured --response_format urlnpm run test-images:raw– usesdebug/debug-call-raw.tsand prints the raw JSON-RPCresult(the underlyingCallToolResultwithout extra wrapping). Same CLI flags as above.
Both scripts truncate large fields for readability:
image_url→ first 80 characters, then...(N chars);b64_jsonanddata(when it is a base64 string) → first 25 characters, then...(N chars).
🧩 Version policy
Semantic Versioning (SemVer)
This package follows SemVer: MAJOR.MINOR.PATCH (x.y.z).
MAJOR— breaking changes (tool names, input schemas, output shapes).MINOR— new tools or backward-compatible additions (new optional params, new fields in responses).PATCH— bug fixes and internal refactors with no intentional behavior change.
Since 1.0.0, this project follows standard SemVer rules: breaking changes bump MAJOR (npm’s ^1.0.0 allows 1.x, but not 2.0.0).
Dependency policy
This repository aims to stay closely aligned with current stable releases:
MCP SDK: targeting the latest stable
@modelcontextprotocol/sdkand schema.OpenAI SDK: regularly updated to the latest stable
openaipackage.Zod: using the Zod 4.x line (currently
^4.1.3). In this project we previously ran on Zod 3.x and, in combination with the MCP TypeScript SDK typings, hit heavy TypeScript errors when passing.shapeintoinputSchema— in particular TS2589 ("type instantiation is excessively deep and possibly infinite") and TS2322 (schema shape not assignable toAnySchema | ZodRawShapeCompat). We track the upstream discussion in modelcontextprotocol/typescript-sdk#494 and the related Zod typing work in colinhacks/zod#5222, and keep the stack on a combination that passes full strict compilation reliably.Tooling stack (Node.js, TypeScript, etc.): developed and tested against recent LTS / current releases, with a dedicated
tsconfig-strict.jsonthat enables all strict TypeScript checks (strict,noUnusedLocals,noUnusedParameters,exactOptionalPropertyTypes,noUncheckedIndexedAccess,noPropertyAccessFromIndexSignature, etc.).
You are welcome to pin or downgrade Node.js, TypeScript, the OpenAI SDK, Zod, or other pieces of the stack if your environment requires it, but please keep in mind:
we primarily test and tune against the latest stack;
issues that only reproduce on older runtimes / SDK versions may be harder for us to investigate and support;
upstream compatibility is validated first of all against the latest MCP spec and OpenAI Images API.
This project is intentionally a bit futuristic: it tries to keep up with new capabilities as they appear in MCP and OpenAI tooling (in particular, robust multimodal/image support over MCP and in ChatGPT’s UI). A detailed real‑world bug report and analysis of MCP image rendering in ChatGPT is listed in the References section as a case study.
If you need a long-term-stable stack, pin exact versions in your own fork and validate them carefully in your environment.
🧩 Typed tool callbacks
All tool handlers use strongly typed callback parameters derived from Zod schemas via z.input<typeof schema>:
// Schema definition
const openaiImagesGenerateBaseSchema = z.object({
prompt: z.string().max(32000),
background: z.enum(["transparent", "opaque", "auto"]).optional(),
// ... more fields
});
// Type alias
type OpenAIImagesGenerateArgs = z.input<typeof openaiImagesGenerateBaseSchema>;
// Strictly typed callback
server.registerTool(
"openai-images-generate",
{ inputSchema: openaiImagesGenerateBaseSchema.shape, ... },
async (args: OpenAIImagesGenerateArgs, _extra: unknown) => {
const validated = openaiImagesGenerateSchema.parse(args);
// ... handler logic
},
);This pattern provides:
Static type safety — IDE autocomplete and compile-time checks for all input fields.
Runtime validation — Zod
.parse()ensures all inputs match the schema before processing.MCP SDK compatibility —
inputSchema: schema.shapeprovides the JSON Schema for tool registration.
All tools (openai-images-*, openai-videos-*, fetch-images, fetch-videos, fetch-document, test-images) follow this pattern.
🧩 Tool annotations
This MCP server exposes the following tools with annotation hints:
Tool |
|
|
|
|
openai-images-generate |
|
|
|
|
openai-images-edit |
|
|
|
|
openai-videos-create |
|
|
|
|
openai-videos-remix |
|
|
|
|
openai-videos-list |
|
|
|
|
openai-videos-retrieve |
|
|
|
|
openai-videos-delete |
|
|
|
|
openai-videos-retrieve-content |
|
|
|
|
fetch-images |
|
|
|
|
fetch-videos |
|
|
|
|
fetch-document |
|
|
|
|
test-images |
|
|
|
|
These hints help MCP clients understand that these tools:
may invoke external APIs or read external resources (open world),
do not modify existing project files or user data; they only create new media files (images/videos/documents) in configured output directories,
may produce different outputs on each call, even with the same inputs.
Because readOnlyHint is set to true for most tools, MCP platforms (including chatgpt.com) can treat this server as logically read-only and usually will not show "this tool can modify your files" warnings.
📁 Project structure
media-gen-mcp/
├── src/
│ ├── index.ts # MCP server entry point
│ └── lib/
│ ├── compression.ts # Image compression (sharp)
│ ├── env.ts # Env parsing + allowlists (+ glob support)
│ ├── helpers.ts # URL/path validation, result building
│ ├── logger.ts # Structured logging + truncation helpers
│ └── schemas.ts # Zod schemas for all tools
├── test/
│ ├── compression.test.ts # 12 tests
│ ├── env.test.ts # 19 tests
│ ├── fetch-images.integration.test.ts# 2 tests
│ ├── fetch-videos.integration.test.ts# 2 tests
│ ├── helpers.test.ts # 31 tests
│ ├── logger.test.ts # 10 tests
│ └── schemas.test.ts # 64 tests
├── debug/ # Local debug helpers (MCP client scripts)
├── plan/ # Design notes / plans
├── dist/ # Compiled output
├── tsconfig.json
├── vitest.config.ts
├── package.json
├── CHANGELOG.md
├── README.md
└── AGENTS.md📝 License
MIT
🩺 Troubleshooting
Make sure your
OPENAI_API_KEYis valid and has image API access.You must have a verified OpenAI organization. After verifying, it can take 15–20 minutes for image API access to activate.
File paths [optional param] must be absolute.
Unix/macOS/Linux: Starting with
/(e.g.,/path/to/image.png)Windows: Drive letter followed by
:(e.g.,C:/path/to/image.pngorC:\path\to\image.png)
For file output, ensure the target directory is writable.
If you see errors about file types, check your image file extensions and formats.
🙏 Inspiration
This server was originally inspired by SureScaleAI/openai-gpt-image-mcp, but is now a separate implementation focused on closely tracking the official specifications:
OpenAI Images API alignment – The arguments for
openai-images-generateandopenai-images-editmirrorimages.create/gpt-image-1.5:prompt,n,size,quality,background,output_format,output_compression,user, plusresponse_format(url/b64_json) with the same semantics as the OpenAI Images API.MCP Tool Result alignment (image + resource_link) – With
result_placement = "content", the server follows the MCP 5.2 Tool Result section (5.2.2 Image Content, 5.2.4 Resource Links) and emits strongly-typedcontent[]items:{ "type": "image", "data": "<base64>", "mimeType": "image/png" }forresponse_format = "b64_json";{ "type": "resource_link", "uri": "file:///..." | "https://...", "name": "...", "mimeType": "image/..." }for file/URL-based output.
Raw OpenAI-style API output – With
result_placement = "api", the tool result itself is an OpenAI Images-style object:{ created, data: [...], background, output_format, size, quality, usage? }, where eachdata[]entry contains eitherb64_json(forresponse_format = "b64_json") orurl(forresponse_format = "url"). No MCP wrapper fields (content,structuredContent,files,urls) are added in this mode.
In short, this library:
tracks the OpenAI Images API for arguments and result shape when
result_placement = "api"withresponse_format = "url" | "b64_json", andfollows the MCP specification for tool result content blocks (
image,resource_link,text) whenresult_placement = "content".
Recommended presets for common clients
Default mode / Claude Desktop / strict MCP clients
For clients that strictly follow the MCP spec, the recommended (and natural) configuration is:result_placement = contentresponse_format = b64_json
In this mode the server returns:
content[]withtype: "image"(base64 image data) andtype: "resource_link"(file/URL links), matching MCP section 5.2 (Image Content and Resource Links). This output works well for direct integration with Claude Desktop and any client that fully implements the 2025‑11‑25 spec.
chatgpt.com Developer Mode
For running this server as an MCP backend behind ChatGPT Developer Mode, the most practical configuration is the one that most closely matches the OpenAI Images API:result_placement = apiresponse_format = url
In this mode the tool result matches the
images.create/gpt-image-1.5format (includingdata[].url), which simplifies consumption from backends and libraries that expect the OpenAI schema.However, even with this OpenAI-native shape, the chatgpt.com client does not currently render images. This behavior is documented in detail in the following report:
https://github.com/strato-space/report/issues/1
⚠️ Limitations & Large File Handling
Configurable payload safeguard: By default this server uses a ~50MB budget (52,428,800 bytes) for inline
contentto stay within typical MCP client limits. You can override this threshold by setting theMCP_MAX_CONTENT_BYTESenvironment variable to a higher (or lower) value.Auto-Switch to File Output: If the total image base64 size exceeds the configured threshold, the tool automatically saves images to disk and returns file path(s) via
resource_linkinstead of inline base64. This helps avoid client-side "payload too large" errors while still delivering full-resolution images.Default File Location: If you do not specify a
filepath, outputs are saved underMEDIA_GEN_DIRS[0](default:/tmp/media-gen-mcp) using names likeoutput_<time_t>_media-gen__<tool>_<id>.<ext>.Environment Variables:
MEDIA_GEN_DIRS: Set this to control where outputs are saved. Example:export MEDIA_GEN_DIRS=/your/desired/dir. This directory may coincide with your public static directory if you serve files directly from it.MEDIA_GEN_MCP_URL_PREFIXES: Optional comma-separated HTTPS prefixes for public URLs, matched positionally toMEDIA_GEN_DIRSentries. When set, the server builds public URLs as<prefix>/<relative_path_inside_root>and returns them alongside file paths (for example viaresource_linkURIs andstructuredContent.data[].urlwhenresponse_format: "url"). Example:export MEDIA_GEN_MCP_URL_PREFIXES=https://media-gen.example.com/media,https://media-gen.example.com/samplesBest Practice: For large or production images, always use file output and ensure your client is configured to handle file paths. Configure
MEDIA_GEN_DIRSand (optionally)MEDIA_GEN_MCP_URL_PREFIXESto serve images via a public web server (e.g., nginx).
🌐 Serving generated files over HTTPS
If you want ChatGPT (or any MCP client) to mention publicly accessible URLs alongside file paths:
Expose your image directory via HTTPS. For example, on nginx:
server { # listen 443 ssl http2; # server_name <server_name>; # ssl_certificate <path>; # ssl_certificate_key <path>; location /media/ { alias /home/username/media-gen-mcp/media/; autoindex off; expires 7d; add_header Cache-Control "public, immutable"; } }Ensure the first entry in
MEDIA_GEN_DIRSpoints to the same directory (e.g.MEDIA_GEN_DIRS=/home/username/media-gen-mcp/media/orMEDIA_GEN_DIRS=media/when running from the project root).Set
MEDIA_GEN_MCP_URL_PREFIXES=https://media-gen.example.com/mediaso the server returns matching HTTPS URLs in top-levelurls,resource_linkURIs, andimage_urlfields (forresponse_format: "url").
Both openai-images-generate and openai-images-edit now attach files + urls for base64 and file response modes, allowing clients to reference either the local filesystem path or the public HTTPS link. This is particularly useful while ChatGPT cannot yet render MCP image blocks inline.
📚 References
Model Context Protocol
OpenAI Images
OpenAI Videos
Case studies
MCP image rendering in ChatGPT (GitHub issue)
Symptoms: ChatGPT often ignored or mishandled MCP
imagecontent blocks: empty tool results, raw base64 treated as text (huge token usage), or generic "I can't see the image" responses, while other MCP clients (Cursor, Claude) rendered the same images correctly.Root cause: not a problem with the MCP spec itself, but with ChatGPT's handling/serialization of MCP
CallToolResultimage content blocks and media objects (especially around UI rendering and nested containers).Status & workarounds: OpenAI has begun rolling out fixes for MCP image support in Codex/ChatGPT, but behavior is still inconsistent; this server uses file/resource_link + URL patterns and spec‑conformant
imageblocks so that tools remain usable across current and future MCP clients.
🙏 Credits
Built with @modelcontextprotocol/sdk
Uses openai Node.js SDK
Refactoring and MCP spec alignment assisted by Windsurf and GPT-5 High Reasoning.
Available Tools
14 toolsfetch-documentFetch DocumentBRead-only
Fetch documents from URLs or local file paths. Downloads remote URLs into MEDIA_GEN_DIRS and returns MCP content blocks as resource_link (default) or embedded resource.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| sources | Yes | Array of document sources: HTTP(S) URLs or file paths (absolute or relative to the first MEDIA_GEN_DIRS entry). Max 20 documents. | |
| tool_result | No | Controls content[] shape: 'resource_link' (default) emits ResourceLink items, 'resource' emits EmbeddedResource blocks with base64 blob. | resource_link |
| file | No | Base path for output files (used when downloading from URLs). If multiple documents are downloaded, an index suffix is added. |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
The description states 'Downloads remote URLs into MEDIA_GEN_DIRS', indicating a write operation, but annotations set readOnlyHint=true. This contradiction severely undermines transparency and could mislead an agent.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Two concise sentences: the first states the core purpose, the second adds key details. No fluff, front-loaded, and every word earns its place.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
The description covers the main behavior, output types, and download destination. However, missing details like supported document formats, error handling, and a description of MEDIA_GEN_DIRS, along with the contradiction, prevent full completeness. Still adequate for a simple tool.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100%, so the schema already describes all parameters. The description adds context about output formats (resource_link vs embedded resource) but does not explain the 'file' parameter further. It meets the baseline but adds limited value.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states it fetches documents from URLs or local file paths, differentiating it from sibling tools like fetch-images and fetch-videos. However, it does not explicitly name these alternatives, slightly reducing clarity.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No explicit when-to-use or when-not-to-use guidance is provided. The purpose is implied by the tool name and sibling context, but an agent might not know if this tool supports all document types or if there are prerequisites.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
fetch-imagesFetch ImagesARead-only
Fetch and process images from URLs or local file paths. Returns MCP CallToolResult with content[] (ResourceLink or ImageContent based on tool_result param) and structuredContent (OpenAI ImagesResponse format with data[].url, data[].path, or data[].b64_json based on response_format param).
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| sources | No | Array of image sources: HTTP(S) URLs or file paths (absolute or relative to the first MEDIA_GEN_DIRS entry). Max 20 images. Mutually exclusive with 'n'. | |
| ids | No | Array of image IDs to fetch by filename match (looks for filenames containing _{id}_ or _{id}. under the primary MEDIA_GEN_DIRS[0] directory). Mutually exclusive with 'sources' and 'n'. | |
| n | No | When set, returns the last N image files from the primary MEDIA_GEN_DIRS[0] directory (most recently modified first). Mutually exclusive with 'sources'. | |
| compression | No | Compression options. If omitted, no compression is applied. | |
| tool_result | No | Controls content[] shape: 'resource_link' (default) emits ResourceLink items, 'image' emits base64 ImageContent blocks. | resource_link |
| response_format | No | Controls structuredContent shape: 'url' (default) emits data[].url, 'path' emits data[].path, 'b64_json' emits data[].b64_json. | url |
| file | No | Base path for output files, absolute or relative to the first MEDIA_GEN_DIRS entry. If multiple images, index suffix is added. |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Annotations already indicate read-only and non-destructive behavior. The description adds value by detailing processing and output format options, enhancing transparency beyond the annotations.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Two sentences, front-loaded with purpose, and no wasted words. Efficiently conveys the core functionality and output structure.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the rich schema and annotations, the description is adequate. It covers the return type and high-level behavior, though some processing details are only in the schema.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100% with detailed descriptions for each parameter. The tool description does not add significant meaning beyond the schema, meeting the baseline of 3.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states it fetches and processes images from URLs or file paths, distinguishing it from sibling tools like fetch-document and fetch-videos. It specifies the output format in detail.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description implies usage for fetching images but does not provide explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like fetch-document or image generation tools. No 'when-not' or context provided.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
fetch-videosFetch VideosBRead-only
Fetch videos from URLs or local file paths. Returns MCP CallToolResult with content blocks (tool_result=resource_link|resource) and structuredContent listing resolved files/URLs.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| sources | No | Array of video sources: HTTP(S) URLs or file paths (absolute or relative to the first MEDIA_GEN_DIRS entry). Max 20 videos. Mutually exclusive with 'n'. | |
| ids | No | Array of video IDs to fetch by filename match (looks for filenames containing _{id}_ or _{id}. under the primary MEDIA_GEN_DIRS[0] directory). Mutually exclusive with 'sources' and 'n'. | |
| n | No | When set, returns the last N video files from the primary MEDIA_GEN_DIRS[0] directory (most recently modified first). Mutually exclusive with 'sources'. | |
| tool_result | No | Controls content[] shape: 'resource_link' (default) emits ResourceLink items, 'resource' emits EmbeddedResource blocks with base64 blob. | resource_link |
| file | No | Base path for output files (when downloading from URLs), absolute or relative to the first MEDIA_GEN_DIRS entry. If multiple videos are downloaded, an index suffix is added. |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Annotations already indicate read-only behavior. Description adds return format details (content blocks, structuredContent) but omits that URL fetching downloads files (implied by 'file' parameter). Does not contradict annotations.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Two front-loaded sentences with zero wasted words. Purpose and return format are conveyed efficiently.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
With no output schema, the description explains return format but lacks detail on 'structuredContent'. Mutual exclusivity of inputs is covered in schema, but the description could supplement this for clarity.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100% so parameters are well documented. Description adds value by explaining the tool_result parameter's impact and return structure, providing context beyond schema descriptions.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Description clearly states 'Fetch videos' and distinguishes from sibling fetch tools by specifying videos. However, it does not fully capture the multiple selection methods (sources, ids, n), making it slightly incomplete.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus siblings like fetch-document or fetch-images, nor on choosing among the three input methods. The description focuses on return format instead of usage context.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
google-videos-generateGoogle Videos GenerateBRead-only
Generate videos using Google GenAI (Veo). Can optionally wait for completion and download generated videos to MEDIA_GEN_DIRS.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| prompt | No | Text prompt that describes the video to generate (max 32K chars). Required unless an input image/video is provided. | |
| input_reference | No | Optional image reference (image-to-video): HTTP(S) URL, base64 / data URL, or file path under MEDIA_GEN_DIRS. | |
| input_reference_mime_type | No | Optional override for input image MIME type (e.g. image/jpeg). Useful when input_reference is raw base64 without a data URL header. | |
| input_video_reference | No | Optional input video reference (video extension): HTTP(S) URL or file path under MEDIA_GEN_DIRS. Mutually exclusive with input_reference. | |
| model | No | Google video model id (default: veo-3.1-generate-001). | veo-3.1-generate-001 |
| number_of_videos | No | Number of videos to generate (default: 1). | |
| aspect_ratio | No | Aspect ratio for the generated video. | |
| duration_seconds | No | Video duration in seconds (provider/model-dependent). | |
| person_generation | No | Controls whether people are allowed in the generated video. | |
| wait_for_completion | No | If true, poll the operation until done (then optionally download). Default: true. | |
| timeout_ms | No | Max time to wait for completion when wait_for_completion is true (default: 900000). | |
| poll_interval_ms | No | Polling interval when wait_for_completion is true (default: 10000). | |
| download_when_done | No | When waiting, whether to download generated videos to MEDIA_GEN_DIRS[0]. Defaults to true when wait_for_completion=true, otherwise false. | |
| tool_result | No | Controls content[] shape when downloading: 'resource_link' (default) emits ResourceLink items, 'resource' emits EmbeddedResource blocks with base64 blob. | resource_link |
| response_format | No | Controls structuredContent video fields: 'url' (default) prefers video.uri, 'b64_json' prefers video.videoBytes. | url |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
The description claims to generate videos (a write operation), but the annotation says readOnlyHint=true. This is a direct contradiction. Additionally, no information about destruction, authentication, or rate limits is provided.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is very concise (two sentences) and front-loaded with purpose. However, it lacks structure (e.g., sections) but is efficient for a simple tool.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given 15 parameters and no output schema, the description is too brief. It does not explain common use cases (e.g., image-to-video, video extension), return value shape, or when to use different parameter combinations. The schema covers details, but description should summarize.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100% with detailed parameter descriptions. The description adds no parameter-level information beyond 'Can optionally wait for completion and download...' which is already implied by parameters. Baseline 3 is appropriate.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states it generates videos using Google GenAI (Veo) and mentions optional waiting and downloading. This distinguishes it from sibling tools like OpenAI video generation and retrieval tools.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description implies when to use (generate a video) but does not provide explicit guidance on when not to use or alternatives. It mentions optional waiting and downloading, but no context on trade-offs or prerequisites.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
google-videos-retrieve-contentGoogle Videos Retrieve ContentARead-only
Download generated video content for a completed Google video operation, write it under MEDIA_GEN_DIRS, and return content blocks (tool_result=resource_link|resource).
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| operation_name | Yes | Google video operation name/id. | |
| index | No | Which generatedVideos[index] to download (default: 0). | |
| tool_result | No | Controls content[] shape: 'resource_link' (default) emits ResourceLink items, 'resource' emits EmbeddedResource blocks with base64 blob. | resource_link |
| response_format | No | Controls structuredContent video fields: 'url' (default) prefers video.uri, 'b64_json' prefers video.videoBytes. | url |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Discloses the side effect of writing to MEDIA_GEN_DIRS, which goes beyond the readOnlyHint and destructiveHint annotations. The description adds useful behavioral context not captured in annotations.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single sentence is adequate but packs multiple actions (download, write, return) into one clause, reducing clarity. Could be more straightforward.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Lacks output schema and does not describe the exact return value format beyond referencing content blocks. Given the complexity, a short description of the returned structure would be beneficial.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema has 100% description coverage, already explaining all parameters. The description mentions tool_result=resource_link|resource, but this adds no new meaning beyond what the schema provides.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Clearly states it downloads generated video content for completed Google video operations, distinguishing it from generation and retrieval of operation status. However, it does not explicitly differentiate from similar sibling tools like openai-videos-retrieve-content.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
Implies usage after a completed generation operation but provides no explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives or when not to use it.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
google-videos-retrieve-operationGoogle Videos Retrieve OperationARead-only
Retrieve the status/result of a Google video generation operation (response_format=url|b64_json controls uri vs videoBytes in structuredContent).
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| operation_name | Yes | Google video operation name/id. | |
| response_format | No | Controls structuredContent video fields: 'url' (default) prefers video.uri, 'b64_json' prefers video.videoBytes. | url |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
The description adds context beyond annotations by explaining that it retrieves status/result and that the response_format parameter controls whether the output uses uri or videoBytes. This is consistent with the readOnlyHint=true annotation.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single sentence that efficiently conveys purpose and parameter influence, with no extraneous information. It is front-loaded with the core action.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
The tool is simple with two well-documented parameters. The description covers purpose and a key parameter effect. However, it lacks details on return format for operations still in progress or error conditions, though these are partially implied.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The input schema has 100% description coverage, so baseline is 3. The description paraphrases the parameter effect but does not add significant meaning beyond the schema's own description.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states it retrieves the status/result of a Google video generation operation, specifying the verb and resource. It differentiates from sibling tools like 'google-videos-retrieve-content' by focusing on status/result rather than content retrieval.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description does not provide explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as 'google-videos-retrieve-content' or other video retrieval tools. Usage context is implied but not stated.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
openai-images-editOpenAI Images EditARead-only
Edit images (inpainting, outpainting, compositing) from 1 to 16 inputs using OpenAI gpt-image-1.5 (default) or gpt-image-1. Returns MCP CallToolResult with content[] (ResourceLink or ImageContent based on tool_result param) and structuredContent (OpenAI ImagesResponse format with data[].url, data[].path, or data[].b64_json based on response_format param).
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| image | Yes | Absolute image path, base64 string, or HTTP(S) URL to edit, or an array of such values (1-16 images). | |
| prompt | Yes | A text description of the desired edit. Max 32000 chars. | |
| mask | No | Optional absolute path, base64 string, or HTTP(S) URL for a mask image (png < 4MB, same dimensions as the first image). Fully transparent areas indicate where to edit. | |
| model | No | gpt-image-1.5 | |
| n | No | Number of images to generate (1-10). | |
| quality | No | Quality (high, medium, low). Default: high. | high |
| size | No | Size of the generated images. Default: 1024x1536. | 1024x1536 |
| user | No | Optional user identifier for OpenAI monitoring. | |
| tool_result | No | Controls content[] shape: 'resource_link' (default) emits ResourceLink items, 'image' emits base64 ImageContent blocks. | resource_link |
| response_format | No | Controls structuredContent shape: 'url' (default) emits data[].url, 'path' emits data[].path, 'b64_json' emits data[].b64_json. | url |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
The description details the output format (CallToolResult with content[] and structuredContent) and the role of tool_result and response_format params, adding value beyond annotations which already indicate read-only behavior.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single sentence but packs essential info efficiently; however, it could be better structured for readability.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the rich schema and no output schema, the description adequately explains the output structure and main purpose, though it omits details like mask constraints.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
With 90% schema description coverage, the description adds only marginal value (e.g., listing edit types and model names). Baseline 3 is appropriate.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states 'Edit images (inpainting, outpainting, compositing)' with specific models and input counts, distinguishing it from the sibling 'openai-images-generate' tool.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
While not explicitly stating when not to use, the description implies usage for image editing tasks and the sibling list shows relevant alternatives, providing clear context.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
openai-images-generateOpenAI Images GenerateCRead-only
Generate images from text prompts using OpenAI gpt-image-1.5 (default) or gpt-image-1. Returns MCP CallToolResult with content[] (ResourceLink or ImageContent based on tool_result param) and structuredContent (OpenAI ImagesResponse format with data[].url, data[].path, or data[].b64_json based on response_format param).
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| prompt | Yes | ||
| background | No | ||
| model | No | gpt-image-1.5 | |
| moderation | No | ||
| n | No | ||
| output_compression | No | ||
| output_format | No | ||
| quality | No | high | |
| size | No | 1024x1536 | |
| user | No | ||
| tool_result | No | Controls content[] shape: 'resource_link' (default) emits ResourceLink items, 'image' emits base64 ImageContent blocks. | resource_link |
| response_format | No | Controls structuredContent shape: 'url' (default) emits data[].url, 'path' emits data[].path, 'b64_json' emits data[].b64_json. | url |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
The description states 'Generate images' which is a creation action, but annotations set readOnlyHint=true, creating a contradiction. Adding behavioral context like API credit consumption or rate limits would be needed, but is absent.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is two sentences and front-loads the action. It is concise but could be better structured to separate purpose from return details. Still efficient overall.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
With 12 parameters, no output schema, and low schema coverage, the description does not provide sufficient context for an agent to select and invoke the tool correctly. Missing parameter explanations and usage context.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
With only 17% schema coverage, the description fails to explain most parameters (prompt, model, size, etc.). It only indirectly mentions tool_result and response_format in the return description, but does not define their values or behavior.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states it generates images from text prompts using specific models, and mentions default model. This distinguishes it from siblings like openai-images-edit, though not explicitly, which prevents a perfect score.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like openai-images-edit or fetch-images. It does not specify prerequisites, contexts, or exclusions.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
openai-videos-createOpenAI Videos CreateBRead-only
Create a video generation job using the OpenAI Videos API. Returns structuredContent with the OpenAI Video job object, and (optionally) downloaded assets as MCP content blocks (tool_result=resource_link|resource).
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| prompt | Yes | Text prompt that describes the video to generate (max 32K chars). | |
| input_reference | No | Optional image reference: HTTP(S) URL, base64 / data URL, or file path. | |
| input_reference_fit | No | How to fit input_reference to the requested video size: match (require exact), cover (crop), contain (pad), stretch (distort). Default: contain. | contain |
| input_reference_background | No | Padding background when input_reference_fit=contain: blur (default), black, white, or hex color (#RRGGBB/#RRGGBBAA). | blur |
| model | No | Video model to use (default: sora-2-pro). | sora-2-pro |
| seconds | No | Clip duration in seconds (default: 4 seconds). | |
| size | No | Output resolution formatted as width x height. Sizes 1024x1792 and 1792x1024 require sora-2-pro. | |
| wait_for_completion | No | If true, poll the job until completed/failed (then optionally download assets). Default: true. | |
| timeout_ms | No | Max time to wait for completion when wait_for_completion is true (default: 900000). | |
| poll_interval_ms | No | Polling interval when wait_for_completion is true (default: 2000). | |
| download_variants | No | Which downloadable assets to fetch when completed (default: ['video']). | |
| tool_result | No | Controls content[] shape: 'resource_link' (default) emits ResourceLink items, 'resource' emits EmbeddedResource blocks with base64 blob. | resource_link |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
The description claims the tool creates a video job, which is a write operation, but the annotations declare readOnlyHint=true, indicating a read-only operation. This is a direct contradiction, making the description misleading. Additionally, the description does not disclose behavioral traits like job lifecycle or side effects beyond annotations.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is two sentences long and covers the core action and output. It is efficient and front-loaded with the primary purpose, though it could be improved by structuring the output behavior more explicitly.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the complexity (12 parameters, no output schema), the description lacks essential context about job lifecycle, polling behavior, and exact return format. It mentions optional downloads but does not explain how the agent should handle job status or errors, leaving significant gaps.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 100%, so the schema already documents all parameters. The description adds no additional parameter-level information beyond what the schema provides, meeting the baseline for this dimension.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the tool's action ('create a video generation job'), specifies the API (OpenAI Videos API), and describes the return value (structuredContent with job object and optional assets). This distinguishes it from sibling tools like openai-videos-retrieve or openai-videos-delete.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description implies usage for creating new video generation jobs, but lacks explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like openai-videos-remix or google-videos-generate. No when-not-to-use conditions or prerequisites are provided.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
openai-videos-deleteOpenAI Videos DeleteCRead-only
Delete a video job by id using the OpenAI Videos API.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| video_id | Yes | Video job id to delete. |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Annotation contradiction: description says 'Delete' (destructive) but annotations claim readOnlyHint=true. No further behavioral context added; expected destructive behavior is contradicted.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Very concise single sentence, but lacks necessary detail. Front-loading is acceptable, but brevity sacrifices informativeness.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a 1-param tool with no output schema and contradictory annotations, description fails to explain consequences of deletion, reversibility, or success confirmation.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100% so baseline 3. Description does not add meaning beyond the schema; merely restates parameter role.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Description clearly states verb 'Delete', resource 'video job by id', and API. It distinguishes from sibling tools like create, list, retrieve, remix.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool vs alternatives, no prerequisites or conditions. Among many sibling tools, agent has no basis for selection.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
openai-videos-listOpenAI Videos ListBRead-only
List video jobs using the OpenAI Videos API. Returns structuredContent with the OpenAI list response shape { data, has_more, last_id }.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| after | No | Cursor (video id) to list after. | |
| limit | No | Page size. | |
| order | No | Sort order of results by timestamp. |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Annotations already provide readOnlyHint=true and destructiveHint=false, so the agent knows it's a safe read. The description adds return format info but no further behavioral traits beyond annotations.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Two concise sentences, front-loaded with the main action. Every sentence adds value, though could be slightly more structured.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a simple list tool with well-documented parameters and no output schema, the description sufficiently explains the return shape. Adequate given the tool's complexity.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
All parameters are documented in the schema with descriptions. The description adds no additional parameter information beyond what the schema already provides.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states 'List video jobs' which is a specific verb and resource. It distinguishes from sibling tools like openai-videos-retrieve (single video) but does not explicitly name alternatives.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. Sibling tools exist for single retrieval and creation, but the description lacks usage context or exclusions.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
openai-videos-remixOpenAI Videos RemixBRead-only
Create a remix video job from an existing video_id. Returns structuredContent with the OpenAI Video job object, and (optionally) downloaded assets as MCP content blocks (tool_result=resource_link|resource).
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| video_id | Yes | Source video job id to remix. | |
| prompt | Yes | Updated prompt that directs the remix (max 32K chars). | |
| wait_for_completion | No | If true, poll the job until completed/failed (then optionally download assets). Default: true. | |
| timeout_ms | No | Max time to wait for completion when wait_for_completion is true (default: 900000). | |
| poll_interval_ms | No | Polling interval when wait_for_completion is true (default: 2000). | |
| download_variants | No | Which downloadable assets to fetch when completed (default: ['video']). | |
| tool_result | No | Controls content[] shape: 'resource_link' (default) emits ResourceLink items, 'resource' emits EmbeddedResource blocks with base64 blob. | resource_link |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
The description claims to 'Create a remix video job', which is a write/mutation operation, contradicting the annotation readOnlyHint=true. This is a serious inconsistency (annotation_contradiction=true). The description also doesn't disclose potential side effects beyond creation, such as cost implications or state changes.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Two sentences efficiently convey purpose and return format. The first sentence immediately states the core action, and the second explains the output. No extraneous information.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
The description covers the essential aspects: what the tool does, the source video, and the return structure. However, it omits details about the job object shape (no output schema), and the 'structuredContent' term is not explained. Despite this, it provides sufficient context for typical usage.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
All 7 parameters have descriptions in the input schema (coverage 100%), so the description adds minimal additional meaning. It references return format but does not elaborate on parameter specifics; baseline 3 is appropriate as schema already carries the burden.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the action ('Create a remix video job'), the resource ('from an existing video_id'), and the result (returns job object and optionally assets). It effectively distinguishes from sibling tools like openai-videos-create or openai-videos-retrieve by specifying the remix operation on an existing video.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description identifies the tool's purpose but does not provide explicit guidance on when to choose it over alternatives (e.g., openai-videos-create for new videos) or when not to use it. No prerequisites or conditions are stated, leaving the agent to infer from context.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
openai-videos-retrieveOpenAI Videos RetrieveARead-only
Retrieve a video job by id using the OpenAI Videos API.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| video_id | Yes | Video job id. |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
The description says 'Retrieve' which aligns with the readOnlyHint annotation. However, it does not add any behavioral details beyond annotations, such as what happens if the job ID is invalid or whether the operation is idempotent (annotation says false but not explained). Adequate but not enhanced.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
One sentence, 10 words, front-loaded with the key action and resource. No extraneous information. Efficient and to the point.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a simple retrieval tool, the description is minimally complete. It states what it does, but lacks details about response format, error handling, or differentiation from content retrieval. Given the absence of output schema, some additional context would be beneficial.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The input schema has 100% coverage with a single parameter 'video_id' described as 'Video job id.' The description adds no further meaning beyond the schema. Baseline score of 3 is appropriate.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states 'Retrieve a video job by id' which is a specific verb-resource pair. It distinguishes from siblings like 'openai-videos-list' (list all) and 'openai-videos-retrieve-content' (get content) by focusing on the job itself.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No usage guidelines provided. The description does not specify when to use this tool over alternatives, such as when to retrieve vs. list, or what prerequisites (e.g., a valid job ID) are needed. An explicit note about using this tool when having an ID would help.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
openai-videos-retrieve-contentOpenAI Videos Retrieve ContentARead-only
Retrieve a video asset (video/thumbnail/spritesheet) for a completed job, write it under MEDIA_GEN_DIRS, and return content blocks (tool_result=resource_link|resource).
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| video_id | Yes | Video job id. | |
| variant | No | Which downloadable asset to return (default: video). | video |
| tool_result | No | Controls content[] shape: 'resource_link' (default) emits ResourceLink items, 'resource' emits EmbeddedResource blocks with base64 blob. | resource_link |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
The description claims the tool writes a file under MEDIA_GEN_DIRS, which is a write operation, but annotations declare readOnlyHint=true. This is a contradiction. No other behavioral traits are disclosed beyond the contradiction.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single, efficient sentence of about 25 words, front-loaded with the purpose. No redundant or wasted words.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
The description covers the main purpose and parameter details, but lacks specifics on output structure (e.g., shape of resource_link vs resource) and file path conventions. With no output schema, this leaves gaps.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100%, baseline 3. The description adds meaning: 'video asset' maps to variant enum, explains tool_result param, and adds 'completed job' context for video_id, going beyond schema descriptions.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description uses a specific verb 'retrieve' and resource 'video asset', clarifying the exact type (video/thumbnail/spritesheet). It distinguishes from siblings like 'google-videos-retrieve-content' by being OpenAI-specific, and adds details about writing to MEDIA_GEN_DIRS and returning content blocks.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description explicitly states 'for a completed job', providing context on when to use. However, it does not explicitly contrast with siblings like 'openai-videos-retrieve' or 'openai-videos-list', leaving some ambiguity.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
TDQS
Tools are clearly grouped by provider and media type (fetch, google-videos, openai-images, openai-videos). Each tool serves a distinct purpose: fetching existing content, generating/editing images, or creating/managing videos. No significant overlap in functionality.
Most tools follow a consistent {provider}-{mediaType}-{action} pattern (e.g., openai-images-generate, google-videos-retrieve-operation). The generic fetch tools (fetch-document, fetch-images, fetch-videos) break the pattern slightly but are still clear and predictable.
14 tools is well-scoped for a media generation server. It covers fetching, image generation/editing, and video creation/management without being overwhelming. Each tool has a clear role.
The tool surface covers core media operations: fetch, generate, edit images, and create/retrieve/delete videos from OpenAI. Minor gaps include lack of Google video job listing/deletion and no image generation from other providers, but the domain is competently covered.
Maintenance
Resources
Unclaimed servers have limited discoverability.
Looking for Admin?
If you are the server author, to access and configure the admin panel.
Related MCP Connectors
Generate AI images and videos from any compatible MCP client.
Generate AI images, video, music, and sound effects, and upscale them, from any MCP client.
MCP server for OpenAI Sora AI video generation
MCP server for Google Veo AI video generation
Related MCP Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityFmaintenanceAn MCP tool server that enables generating and editing images through OpenAI's image models, supporting text-to-image generation and advanced image editing (inpainting, outpainting) across various MCP-compatible clients.110MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceMCP server that wraps OpenAI's image generation and editing APIs, enabling text-to-image and image-to-image operations via tools.24938ISC
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server for AI-powered image processing (generate, edit, vary, analyze) supporting OpenAI, Gemini, Ideogram, and custom relay endpoints.
- FlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceMCP server for AI image generation supporting text-to-image and image-to-image editing via any OpenAI-compatible service, with configurable models, aspect ratios, and sizes.2
Latest Blog Posts
- Who's Calling? MCP Hosts Are an Identity Blind Spot (And the Spec Knows It)By Om-Shree-0709 on .mcpAgent IdentityOAuth 2.1
- Your AI Chatbot Just Exposed Your CEO's Salary to an InternBy Om-Shree-0709 on .Agent IdentityMCP SecurityOAuth Delegation
- Why MCP Servers Need Execution Sandboxing (And Why Your Current Stack Isn't Enough)By Om-Shree-0709 on .Agentic AiPrompt InjectionWebAssembly
MCP directory API
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/strato-space/media-gen-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server