Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to Griphook

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A comprehensive MCP server providing unified access to over 144 tools for lending, trading, and staking across six major DeFi protocols on the Stacks Bitcoin Layer 2. It enables AI agents to perform complex blockchain operations and interact with the DeFi ecosystem using natural language commands.
      3
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      F
      maintenance
      An MCP server for the Sui blockchain that enables AI agents to manage accounts, execute token swaps, and perform smart contract development using the Sui CLI. It supports over 30 tools for DeFi operations, staking, and market data via Pyth price oracles.
      10 npm
      2
      MIT
    • F
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server providing AI agents with native access to Jupiter's full DeFi stack on Solana. It offers 17 tools covering swaps, tokens, lending, limit orders, DCA, prediction markets, perpetuals, and portfolio management.
      16
      -
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      F
      maintenance
      MCP server for DeFi execution — lets AI agents swap, provide liquidity, lend, bridge, and run yield strategies across 22 chains in a single transaction. 7 tools for token discovery, portfolio analysis, quoting, and execution via the Haiku API.
      7
      45 npm
      2
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server that gives AI agents real-time access to DeFi across multiple chains, enabling non-custodial crypto trading, portfolio queries, and transaction execution.
      5 npm
      7
      MIT

    TDQS

    C2.7/5.0

    Scored across 67 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Tools are well-organized by domain (admin, bridge, cdp, lending, etc.) with clear distinctions within each category. However, some pairs like strato.cdp.mint and strato.cdp.mint-max or strato.lending.borrow and strato.lending.borrow-max have overlapping purposes that could cause confusion, though descriptions clarify the 'max' variants.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Naming follows a highly consistent pattern: all tools use snake_case with a clear domain prefix (strato.<domain>) and descriptive action names. The structure is uniform across all 67 tools, making them predictable and easy to parse.

    Tool Count2/5

    With 67 tools, the count is excessive for a single server, even for a comprehensive DeFi platform. This many tools will overwhelm agents, increase cognitive load, and likely lead to misselection or inefficiency. A more modular approach with separate servers per domain would be more appropriate.

    Completeness5/5

    The toolset provides extensive coverage across multiple DeFi domains (admin, bridge, CDP, lending, rewards, swap, tokens). Each domain includes full CRUD/lifecycle operations, administrative controls, and user actions, leaving no obvious gaps for the intended functionality.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues