A
licenseA
qualityD
maintenanceCompliance and guardrails infrastructure for AI agents, enabling safe operations within regulatory boundaries like GDPR and EU AI Act.
6
38 PyPI
MIT
strale-mcp
by strale-io
Related Servers
Alternatives to strale-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables EU AI Act compliance for AI agent systems by providing risk classification, audit trails, gap analysis, and evidence package generation.30 npmMIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceURL intelligence for AI agents. One URL in, structured security and data quality signals out across 7 dimensions. 13 tools, risk score 0-100 with 23 configurable weights.1622 npm1MIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceStructured business intelligence for AI agents. 11.3M verified entities, 40.3M BORME mercantile acts, EU VAT validation (VIES), GLEIF LEI and healthcare registries. 12 tools.61MIT
Qinisoofficial
AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceThe deterministic fact-verification layer for AI agents. Validates the structured facts an agent emits — IBANs, payment cards, VAT and national tax IDs, crypto and bank addresses, domains, emails, phone numbers, securities and academic identifiers, plus dates, currencies and holidays — against checksums and curated authoritative data, not guesses.561Apache 2.0- AlicenseBqualityBmaintenanceProvides AI governance and action-assurance primitives, enabling trust scoring, policy-based allow/deny decisions, risk assessment, EU AI Act compliance checks, and an emergency kill-switch for autonomous agents.614 npmMIT
TDQS
A3.9/5.0
Scored across 9 tools
Disambiguation4/5
Most tools target clearly distinct concerns (connectivity, search, execute, wallet, transaction lookup, trust profile). The main boundary issue is strale_web3_assurance versus strale_execute with a web3 slug, and strale_methodology's vague description ('testing modes, source context and transaction retrieval') overlaps with strale_trust_profile and strale_transaction.
Naming Consistency4/5
All tools share a consistent strale_ prefix and snake_case naming. The only deviation is stylistic: some names are verbs (execute, search, ping) while others are nouns (balance, transaction, methodology), though each is still readable and predictable.
Tool Count5/5
Nine tools is well within the sweet spot for a capability-registry gateway. Each tool maps to a distinct step in the workflow (connect, onboard, search, check funds, execute, audit, etc.) and none feels redundant.
Completeness4/5
The core lifecycle — search, execute, inspect transactions, check balance, verify trust, onboarding, connectivity — is covered. Minor gaps: no dedicated list/history endpoint for transactions or capabilities (search partially covers), and no key/wallet management, but agents can work around these.
Maintenance
ActivityActive
ResponsivenessResponsive