A股限售解禁日历

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

描述仅为数据获取操作，无注解，但未声明副作用或权限需求。由于是只读操作，行为风险低，但未提供完整透明度（如速率限制、数据更新频率）。

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

描述仅两句话，第一句明确功能，第二句提供背景。无冗余信息，但缺乏结构化（如使用列表或分段）。

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

模式覆盖率100%，但无输出模式，描述未说明返回数据的结构或字段，对于理解完整的输入输出上下文不够完善。

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

输入模式参数覆盖率100%，每个参数均有默认值和描述，但描述文本未额外添加语义，如日期格式的示例或limit的合理范围。基线为3，描述未超越模式本身。

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

描述明确使用动词'获取'和'查看'，资源为'A股限售解禁日历'，并说明了功能（查看即将解禁的股票及解禁规模）。在兄弟工具中没有直接重复功能的工具，自然区分了目的。

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

描述未提供任何使用时机或替代工具的指引，没有说明何时使用此工具而非兄弟工具，也没有排除情况。

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.