Skip to main content
Glama
stillmarcus24

stillos-notary-mcp

by stillmarcus24
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
JavaScript
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to stillos-notary-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • VerifyAPI MCP Server

      KyTheKitty
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables agents and clients to fact-check factual claims against live web sources, returning citable verdicts with source details and cryptographically signed receipts for downstream verification.
      1
      78 npm
      MIT

    • proofspec

      christian140903-sudo
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables defining and verifying evidence contracts for claims in READMEs, releases, or product pages using constrained verifiers and generating hash-chained receipts and reports.
      12 npm
      MIT
    • catqualia-ledger-mcp by OpeningBlackBox

      catqualia-ledger-mcpofficial

      OpeningBlackBox
      F
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables agents to verify claims against a real falsification ledger, querying pre-registered refutation thresholds, recorded verdicts, and verifier drift metrics instead of guessing.
      5
      -

    • APEX PSI MCP Server

      kawal393
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Provides cryptographic truth infrastructure for AI agents, enabling them to seal content with SHA-256 and Ed25519, verify receipts, anchor them to Bitcoin via OpenTimestamps, generate citations, and audit chains of receipts.
      5
      26 npm
      1
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A4.1/5.0

    Scored across 5 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct action—general claim resolution, specialized scoring, OFAC screening, dispute filing, and receipt verification. The overlapping 'signed verdict' outputs are clearly differentiated by resolver type, pricing model, and lifecycle role.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Most tools follow a clear verb_noun pattern: claim_verdict, file_dispute, screen_entity, verify_receipt. distress_score breaks that pattern as a noun phrase, making it the one inconsistent name in an otherwise coherent set.

    Tool Count5/5

    Five tools is well-scoped for a notary-style service. The set covers creation, specialized verdict types, dispute handling, and verification without unnecessary redundancy.

    Completeness4/5

    The core lifecycle is covered: create verdicts, dispute them, and verify receipts. A minor gap is the lack of a general receipt-listing or lookup tool, though verify_receipt by hash mitigates this.

    Maintenance

    ActivityActive
    ResponsivenessSlow

    Resources