Skip to main content
Glama
stier-tfedorko

LicenseSpring MCP Server

by stier-tfedorko
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
JavaScript
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to LicenseSpring MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • Civo MCP Server

      tao12345666333
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server implementation that integrates with the Civo cloud platform API, providing capabilities to manage cloud instances, networks, and Kubernetes clusters.
      19
      4 npm
      3
      MIT

    • Mews MCP

      code-rabi
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      This MCP server provides comprehensive access to the Mews hospitality platform API, covering customer and company management, reservation operations, financial transactions, account management, configuration settings, and services inventory. It implements the core functionality needed for hospitalit
      53
      6 npm
      MIT

    • MCP REST API Server

      vinaykp
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A server implementation of the Model Context Protocol (MCP) that provides REST API endpoints for managing and interacting with MCP resources.
      -
    • Emeritus MCP Server by Emeritus-China

      Emeritus MCP Serverofficial

      Emeritus-China
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server for integrating AI models with Emeritus services, enabling user management, tag operations, order management, and leads import via a standardized interface.
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    B3/5.0

    Scored across 18 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools have distinct purposes targeting specific license management operations, but there is some potential confusion between activate_license/activate_offline and deactivate_license/deactivate_offline pairs where the offline variants might not be immediately distinguishable from the regular ones without careful reading of descriptions. The consumption tools (add_consumption vs add_feature_consumption) also have some overlap but are reasonably differentiated.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All 18 tools follow a consistent verb_noun naming pattern with snake_case throughout. The naming convention is highly predictable with clear action-object relationships (e.g., activate_license, check_license, get_product_details, track_device_variables). No mixing of naming styles or inconsistent verb usage is present.

    Tool Count4/5

    With 18 tools, this is slightly on the higher side but reasonable for a comprehensive license management system covering activation, deactivation, consumption tracking, floating licenses, customer management, and device variables. The count feels appropriate for the domain scope, though it might be borderline heavy for some agent workflows.

    Completeness5/5

    The tool set provides excellent coverage of license management workflows including core operations (activate, check, deactivate), consumption management, floating license handling, customer/user management, product information access, trial key generation, and device variable tracking. There are no obvious gaps for the stated domain, with tools supporting both online and offline scenarios.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources