Skip to main content
Glama
stevenmichiels

raindrop-mcp

Related Servers

Alternatives to raindrop-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to access and manage Raindrop.io bookmarks, collections, tags, and highlights through the Model Context Protocol. Supports CRUD operations, advanced search, file uploads, and bulk editing of bookmarks.
      37 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables management of Raindrop.io bookmarks, collections, tags, and highlights via MCP tools, with support for search, bulk editing, and library auditing.
      17
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Exposes the Raindrop.io API as Claude tools for managing bookmarks, collections, tags, and bulk operations, with proper collection move support.
      19
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables language models to access and manage Raindrop.io bookmarks, collections, tags, and highlights through the Model Context Protocol.
      15 npm
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4.1/5.0

    Scored across 6 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool maps to a distinct resource-action pair: tags, collections, and bookmarks are cleanly separated, and get_bookmark is clearly different from search_bookmarks. No two tools appear to do the same thing.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow the same lowercase verb_noun pattern: list, create, get, search, update. This is a predictable and consistent convention across the entire set.

    Tool Count5/5

    Six tools is well-scoped for a Raindrop.io integration covering bookmarks, collections, and tags. Each tool has a clear purpose and the set is not bloated or overly thin.

    Completeness3/5

    Bookmark reading, creation, updating, and searching are covered, but there is no delete_bookmark, which is a notable lifecycle gap. Collections and tags are read-only, so collection/tag management operations are missing, though this may be intentional for a read-focused MCP server.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues