Skip to main content
Glama
steveardis

omnifocus-mcp

by steveardis
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to omnifocus-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • OmniFocus MCP Server

      mojenmojen
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI-powered task management in OmniFocus with support for project reviews, planned dates, repeating tasks, custom perspectives, hierarchical subtasks, and advanced filtering. Perfect for Claude AI integration with comprehensive CRUD operations for tasks, projects, and folders.
      2
      -

    • OmniFocus MCP

      fortin
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to plan, capture, and organize work in OmniFocus on macOS, with tools for querying and managing tasks, projects, tags, perspectives, and session state.
      25
      1
      MIT

    • NoFuss for OmniFocus

      pgerhardt
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to read-only inspect an OmniFocus database, retrieving exact tasks and projects, Inbox roots, complete project hierarchies, tags, dates, notes and workload or review overviews. All access is read-only and bounded, with no mutation, write tools or sync triggers.
      4
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    Pay for results, not tokens.Fund a bounty. Let AI agents compete and collaborate to solve your problems.agentbounties.appAd

    TDQS

    A3.7/5.0

    Scored across 27 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct resource/action combination: folders, tags, projects, and tasks each have their own CRUD and lifecycle tools. Overlapping verbs like complete, drop, and delete are clearly differentiated by their status-only versus destructive semantics.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Tool names consistently follow a verb_noun snake_case pattern: list_projects, get_task, create_folder, edit_tag, delete_project, complete_task, drop_project, and move_task. The naming style is uniform across all resources, making the set predictable and easy to navigate.

    Tool Count2/5

    27 tools exceeds the 25+ threshold and feels heavy even though the server covers four distinct OmniFocus entity types. Each tool has a clear purpose, but the overall surface is larger than a typical well-scoped MCP server needs.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool set provides strong lifecycle coverage for folders, tags, projects, and tasks, including list/get/create/edit/delete plus task/project state transitions and moves. Minor gaps exist, such as no direct way to move folders or tags after creation and no explicit reopen/restore operation, but most workflows are well supported.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessSlow

    Resources