Skip to main content
Glama
steve-8000
by steve-8000

Related Servers

Alternatives to lazy-intel

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Local-first code intelligence for coding agents. Exposes precomputed SCIP navigation, Zoekt lexical search, cross-repo blast radius, and semantic search as MCP tools.
      9
      4
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables coding agents to index and search multi-project codebases through semantic and full-text retrieval, symbol lookup, and reference search via a local MCP endpoint.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables people and AI agents to query local code repositories as graphs through stdio MCP tools for project listing, search, dependency tracing, impact analysis, bridge detection, node inspection, bounded code reading, and optional LSP definition/reference lookups.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      A unified code-intelligence gateway MCP server that gives coding agents a single safe API to search, trace, and understand any codebase using graph, LSP, and semantic engines, with a local-first privacy model and a safe-null contract.
      171 PyPI
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.9/5.0

    Scored across 1 tool

    Disambiguation5/5

    With only one tool, there is no possibility of confusing it with others. The tool's description clearly defines its role as a unified code intelligence and index control plane.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    A single tool name cannot exhibit inconsistency. 'code_intel' is a clear, descriptive name that does not conflict with any other naming pattern.

    Tool Count3/5

    One tool feels thin for the broad scope described, which includes retrieval, architecture analysis, symbol semantics, and index management. However, the tool is explicitly a unified control plane, so the single-entry design may be intentional.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool covers semantic retrieval, architecture/call-flow/impact, symbol semantics, and index maintenance, which appears fairly comprehensive for its stated purpose. Minor gaps might exist around explicit user-facing query operations, but the surface seems largely complete.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues