Skip to main content
Glama
stemado

scout-mcp-server

by stemado
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to scout-mcp-server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • MCP Browser

      wgarrido
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server that lets AI assistants browse the web through your real Chrome with your cookies, sessions, and fingerprint, avoiding bot detection and CAPTCHAs. Enables web browsing, content extraction, and multi-step workflows via persistent tabs.
      15
      1 npm
      3
      MIT

    • camofox-browser-mcp

      Microck
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server for controlling a local camofox-browser instance, enabling LLM agents to perform web automation tasks such as navigation, interaction, snapshotting, and content extraction.
      16 npm
      MIT

    • agent-stealth-browser

      Edwardsaga
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A stealth-enhanced browser automation MCP server for AI agents to interact with websites while bypassing anti-bot detection mechanisms like Cloudflare and reCAPTCHA.
      9
      MIT

    • Scout

      Lautrek
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Browser MCP server that connects to your existing browser, preserving sessions, passwords, and extensions, enabling AI agents to interact with web pages without bot detection.
      31
      7 npm
      1
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A4.2/5.0

    Scored across 21 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose, from session management (launch/close) to interaction (click/type), page reconnaissance, network monitoring, downloads, video recording, scheduling, and security. No two tools overlap in function; even similar actions like browse and scout_page_tool operate in different contexts (standalone vs. session).

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Most tools follow a verb_noun pattern (e.g., allow_navigation, check_extension, execute_javascript). However, a few deviate: the schedule tools use noun_verb (schedule_create), and some tools have a 'tool' suffix (execute_action_tool, inspect_element_tool) while others do not. This minor inconsistency prevents a perfect score but does not hinder readability.

    Tool Count5/5

    With 21 tools, the server strikes an excellent balance between comprehensive capabilities and manageable scope. Each tool addresses a specific need in web automation, and the count feels well-calibrated for a tool server that handles sessions, interactions, media, scheduling, and security.

    Completeness5/5

    The tool surface covers the full lifecycle of web automation: session control, navigation, element interaction, JavaScript execution, page analysis, screenshots, video recording, network monitoring, download processing, 2FA, security auditing, and scheduling. There are no obvious gaps; agents can accomplish complex workflows without resorting to workarounds.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessSyncing

    Resources