Skip to main content
Glama
steipete

macOS Automator MCP Server

by steipete

Related Servers

Alternatives to macOS Automator MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A Model Context Protocol server that enables execution of AppleScript and JavaScript for Automation scripts on macOS, allowing programmatic control of applications and system functions through a rich knowledge base of pre-defined scripts.
      2
      984 npm
      8
      MIT
    • F
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Secure AppleScript execution for AI applications via Model Context Protocol with configurable security profiles and automatic TCC permission handling.
      3
      1
      -
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables local macOS automation via the Model Context Protocol, allowing file operations, system monitoring, shell commands, clipboard access, and screenshots with configurable security restrictions.
      14
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A Model Context Protocol server that enables AI assistants to control Apple Keynote presentations through AppleScript automation, supporting comprehensive slide creation, management, and content operations.
      32 PyPI
      76
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4.4/5.0

    Scored across 2 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    The two tools have clearly distinct purposes: execute_script runs scripts, while get_scripting_tips discovers scripts and provides knowledge. No overlap in functionality, making it easy for an agent to choose correctly.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Both tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern in snake_case (execute_script, get_scripting_tips), which is predictable and clear.

    Tool Count3/5

    With only 2 tools, the server feels underdeveloped for a comprehensive macOS automation tool. While execution and discovery are covered, a richer toolset (e.g., script management, system status) would be expected. The count is borderline for the apparent scope.

    Completeness3/5

    The server covers the core needs of executing scripts and discovering pre-built solutions via a knowledge base. However, it lacks tools for managing scripts (e.g., listing custom scripts, editing them) and more direct system control. Some workflows may require more than these two tools.

    Maintenance

    ActivityActive
    ResponsivenessWithin a week