macOS Automator MCP Server
Related Servers
Alternatives to macOS Automator MCP Server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol server that enables execution of AppleScript and JavaScript for Automation scripts on macOS, allowing programmatic control of applications and system functions through a rich knowledge base of pre-defined scripts.2984 npm8MIT
- AlicenseAqualityFmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol server that enables running AppleScript code to interact with Mac applications and system features including Notes, Calendar, Contacts, Messages, file management, and more.196 npm466MIT
- FlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceSecure AppleScript execution for AI applications via Model Context Protocol with configurable security profiles and automatic TCC permission handling.31-
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol server that enables direct integration with macOS Calendar application using AppleScript, allowing users to create, list, and search calendar events without requiring OAuth setup.86MIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceEnables local macOS automation via the Model Context Protocol, allowing file operations, system monitoring, shell commands, clipboard access, and screenshots with configurable security restrictions.14MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol server that enables AI assistants to control Apple Keynote presentations through AppleScript automation, supporting comprehensive slide creation, management, and content operations.32 PyPI76MIT
TDQS
Scored across 2 tools
The two tools have clearly distinct purposes: execute_script runs scripts, while get_scripting_tips discovers scripts and provides knowledge. No overlap in functionality, making it easy for an agent to choose correctly.
Both tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern in snake_case (execute_script, get_scripting_tips), which is predictable and clear.
With only 2 tools, the server feels underdeveloped for a comprehensive macOS automation tool. While execution and discovery are covered, a richer toolset (e.g., script management, system status) would be expected. The count is borderline for the apparent scope.
The server covers the core needs of executing scripts and discovering pre-built solutions via a knowledge base. However, it lacks tools for managing scripts (e.g., listing custom scripts, editing them) and more direct system control. Some workflows may require more than these two tools.